| LEADER |
02052nam a22002177a 4500 |
| 001 |
1818301 |
| 041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b مصر
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a الكفراوي، أسعد عبدالغني السيد
|q Alkafrawi, Asaad Abdulghani Alsayed
|e مؤلف
|9 161018
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a الترجيح بكثرة الرواة:
|b دراسة أصولية تطبيقية
|
| 246 |
|
|
|a Preponderance by Means of Mass Transmission:
|b An Applied Usuli Study
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b دار الافتاء المصرية
|c 2019
|g يوليه
|m 1440
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 12 - 81
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b - This research paper explores the question of whether the authority of a hadith is based on the number of its narrators. - It also explores whether a hadith whose number of narrators is greater than another is considered more authoritative in the event they conflict when: (i) both reports are equally valid as evidence; and (ii) the number of narrators of both reports do not meet the number required for mass transmission. - There are three scholarly opinions on the matter: 1- The report transmitted by the greatest number of narrators takes precedence over the report transmitted by fewer narrators. 2- Preponderance is not contingent upon the multiplicity of narrators. 3- Preponderance depends on the mujtahid's assumption. - This research paper gives precedence to reports having the greater number of narrators over those with less numbers. - The practical effects of this matter are manifest in certain juristic branches based on conflicting reports, some of which are given preponderance over others because of the multiplicity of narrators.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a علم الأصول
|a المذاهب الفقهية
|a الروايات الدينية
|a العدالة الاجتماعية
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 الفقه الإسلامي
|6 Islamic Jurisprudence
|c 002
|l 038
|m ع38
|o 0783
|s مجلة دار الإفتاء المصرية
|t Journal of Egyptian House of Fatwa
|v 000
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 0783-000-038-002.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q n
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a IslamicInfo
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 1078560
|d 1078560
|
