ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







The Impact of Mix-Jurisdiction in Sudanese Civil Law

المصدر: مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
الناشر: كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Osman, Ayman Mohamed Zain (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Ibrahim, Hafez Gaffer (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج7, ع28
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الكويت
التاريخ الميلادي: 2019
الشهر: ديسمبر
الصفحات: 137 - 162
DOI: 10.54032/2203-007-028-003
ISSN: 2410-2237
رقم MD: 1100863
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Schools of Legislation | Sudanese Civil Law | English System | Unified Arab Legislation | Latin Jurisprudence | Islamic Sharia Rules | Anglo-Saxon Jurisprudence
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

3

حفظ في:
LEADER 02463nam a22002417a 4500
001 1841959
024 |3 10.54032/2203-007-028-003 
041 |a eng 
044 |b الكويت 
100 |9 592431  |a Osman, Ayman Mohamed Zain  |e Author 
245 |a The Impact of Mix-Jurisdiction in Sudanese Civil Law 
260 |b كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |c 2019  |g ديسمبر 
300 |a 137 - 162 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b The Sudanese civil code is distinguished by a character that could not be seen in any legislation in the Arab world. The Sudanese legislator experienced different schools of legislation including Latin, Anglo Saxon jurisprudence and some of the Islamic Sharia rules. This has given rise to a wide-range argument over such experiences on the judicial application. No doubt such different experiences in the schools of law were imposed by the composition of the Sudanese state from this historic point of view. So, in this study we would explore the impacts of the Sudanese legislator’s transitions from the Anglo-Saxon to the unified Arabian Legal System, whose provisions are drawn from the French Civil Law, it is also aims to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of such transition and the justifications for the change of the legal system and its impact on the judicial judgments. Through this study, which addresses the principles of the Supreme Court judgments, we realized that the transition to the Latin Laws entailed certain shortcomings, because it was only partial and supplemented by judicial precedence’s which are not in conflict with the Islamic Sharia. The study came up with numbers of recommendations in this respect." 
653 |a الأحكام القضائية  |a القوانين المدنية  |a التشريعات السودانية  |a الأنظمة القانونية 
692 |b Schools of Legislation  |b Sudanese Civil Law  |b English System  |b Unified Arab Legislation  |b Latin Jurisprudence  |b Islamic Sharia Rules  |b Anglo-Saxon Jurisprudence 
700 |9 592432  |a Ibrahim, Hafez Gaffer  |e Co-Author 
773 |4 القانون  |6 Law  |c 003  |e kuwait International law School Journal  |f Mağallaẗ kulliyyaẗ al-qānūn al-kuwaytiyyaẗ al-ʿālamiyyaẗ  |l 028  |m مج7, ع28  |o 2203  |s مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |v 007  |x 2410-2237 
856 |u 2203-007-028-003.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1100863  |d 1100863 

عناصر مشابهة