| المستخلص: |
إن القانون عبارة عن مجموعة قواعد تنظم سلوك الأفراد المتمثلة في التعبير عن إرادتهم داخل إطار مجتمعاتهم، أي أن يقوموا الأفراد بإظهار ذلك السلوك للعلن فيما يتجسد بفعل ما حتي يقوم القانون بتنظيمه، كما أن القانون لا يختص ولا ينظم ولا يعاقب لما هو في صدور الأشخاص لأن هذه النوايا والبواعث لا يعملها إلا الله وحده، فلذلك ليأخذ القانون مسلكه لابد أن يصادفه تعبير عن إرادة بأكثر من طريقة حدثنا عنها القانون المدني كالتعبير بالقول أولًا أو كتابيًا أو بالإشارة وفقًا للضوابط والأحكام، ولما كان القانون لا ينظم إلا السلوك الخارجي للأشخاص دون النوايا فيثار السؤال هنا ما هو دور السكوت في المعاملات وهل يرتب السكوت أثرًا في القانون المدني؟ وهل يعد السكوت تعبيرًا عن إرادة؟ ومن الممكن أن ينشئ التزامًا أو يسقط حقًا أو العكس؟، لذا من خلال هذا البحث سنجد أجوبة عديدة لجميع تلك التساؤلات.
The research in brief: The research is about the silence in civil law first of all we should talk about the meaning of silence and it define as a person refrains from speaking or speaking, meaning that he knows about something and chooses not to express his will. And also has another meaning, which is not to speak with the ability to do so. Moreover in this search we should talk about The meaning of silence in the law it came as a negative position from which nothing can be understood at all, also the circumstances surrounding Act on the silence the act itself that make it incline as an expression of a desire, then we will then be silence a statement of a will, and it is worth noting if Previous dealings were frequent among the contracting parties, and each time the other was silent about the second and implemented the corresponding obligations. This is an example that silence is a statement and not a negative position. Also we must exposure the meaning in Islam beside some of schools of thought the religious jurists considered that silence cannot be attributed to any saying and that silence cannot be attributed to it, however the schools of thought, which are considered under Islamic law, but some of them differed slightly from the other. The Hanafi school of thought: It expanded greatly in cases of silence and was included in nearly fifty cases and considered that those cases in which silence promised an expression of will and acceptance of the answer presented. As for the Maliki doctrine: it did not expand as the Hanafi doctrine, but was accurate in that and made each case separately and not measured According to any of them, beside that the Shafi'i and hanbli.
|
