ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







The Communicative Force of Assertive Speech Acts in Crest's Translation of Remarque's "Im Westen Nichts Neues"

المصدر: مجلة كلية الآداب
الناشر: جامعة الزقازيق - كلية الآداب
المؤلف الرئيسي: Kotb, Naglaa Muhammed El Sayed (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Salah El-Din, Ahmed (Advisor)
المجلد/العدد: ع91
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2019
الصفحات: 3 - 33
ISSN: 1687-3548
رقم MD: 1124909
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Pragmatics | Argumentation | Assertive Speech Acts | Communication
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

1

حفظ في:
LEADER 02521nam a22002297a 4500
001 1867707
041 |a eng 
044 |b مصر 
100 |9 604169  |a Kotb, Naglaa Muhammed El Sayed  |e Author 
245 |a The Communicative Force of Assertive Speech Acts in Crest's Translation of Remarque's "Im Westen Nichts Neues" 
260 |b جامعة الزقازيق - كلية الآداب  |c 2019 
300 |a 3 - 33 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b Asserting a claim means advancing argumentation by backing up reasonable arguments. It is a distinctive activity that requires a certain amount of intelligence. According to Searle (1969: 66), the act of asserting a claim or giving reasons is called arguing. In spite of the research presented for understanding the argumentative function of the language, the factors affecting the composition of an argumentative text varies according to several linguistic features. Thus, this study deals with the act of arguing in a political narrative from a pragmatic perspective. Just so, this study attempts to answer two main questions that have the same scope: (1) What are the pragmatic realizations of the act of asserting in narratives? And (2) What is the significance of the illocutionary force of assertive speech acts in advancing argumentation in written texts? The corpus of the study consists of some selected dramatic passages of Remarque's political novel with common English publication by Fawcett Crest. In answering the study questions, it is hypothesized that (1) the act of arguing in written texts, more specifically in political narratives, usually takes the form of an assertive, (2) a great coherent communicative force is best viewed in the illocutionary force of this act that leads to effective perlocutionary effects. In order to reach convincing results proving the hypothesis, a qualitative descriptive approach is developed for the analysis of the data relying on observation and introspective reading. 
653 |a الروايات الغربية  |a النص الحجاجي  |a أفعال الكلام 
692 |b Pragmatics  |b Argumentation  |b Assertive Speech Acts  |b Communication 
700 |9 604170  |a Salah El-Din, Ahmed  |e Advisor 
773 |4 العلوم الإنسانية ، متعددة التخصصات  |6 Humanities, Multidisciplinary  |c 007  |e Faculty of Arts Journal  |l 091  |m ع91  |o 1062  |s مجلة كلية الآداب  |v 000  |x 1687-3548 
856 |u 1062-000-091-007.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a AraBase 
999 |c 1124909  |d 1124909 

عناصر مشابهة