ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > قاعدة "ما حرم سدا للذريعة يباح...>الوصف

قاعدة "ما حرم سدا للذريعة يباح للمصلحة الراجحة" وتطبيقاتها الفقهية المعاصرة

العنوان بلغة أخرى: The Rule "What was Forbidden in the Pretext "Excuse" is Permissible for the Most Favorable Interest" and its Contemporary Juristic Applications
المصدر: مجلة البحوث الفقهية المعاصرة
الناشر: مؤسسة البحوث والدراسات الفقهية وعلوم القرآن الكريم الوقفية
المؤلف الرئيسي: عياش، محمد على (مؤلف)
المجلد/العدد: مج33, ع118
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: السعودية
التاريخ الميلادي: 2021
التاريخ الهجري: 1442
الشهر: يناير
الصفحات: 468 - 551
ISSN: 1319-0792
رقم MD: 1165776
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
الأحكام الشرعية | التطبيقات المعاصرة | الفقه الإسلامي | الشريعة الإسلامية | السياسة الشرعية
رابط المحتوى:

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: There are those pretext blockings that are absolute, even if committing them entail interests that are more important than them; there are those who open pretexts without regarding any corruption that it might lead to, the former lost many interests, the latter caused many corruptions, and both opinions are wrong in the application. The right between the two bad is the better one as it was said, and this will be evident by speaking on the basis of "what has been forbidden in the pretext (excuse) "is permissible for the most favourable interest. The rule "What is forbidden in the pretext (excuse) is permissible for the most favourable interest" is considered of the science of purposes that shows the validity of Islamic law for every time and place, the extent of the flexibility of the legislation and its permissibility, and observation of the reality of people and their conditions. It also opens the door for the diligent in balancing between the forbidden pretext and the realization of interest, making the forbidden pretext dependant on achieving the overriding interests. It regulates the principle of forbidden pretexts (excuses) and takes precedence in such a way that it is compatible with the rules of the science of origins. This principle does not prevail, so interests are disrupted and people fall into embarrassment and distress. Rather, they are valid with their striving towards .the interest and seeking to achieve them What the researcher seeks in this research is to show some of these beautiful aspects of this law by studying the fundamentals of science of purposes by showing the meaning of these rules and knowing its evidence and proof. Furthermore, clarify its relationship with the Investigation of Fundamentals, the Investigation of the science of purposes and the Principles of Jurisprudence. Finally, knowing how to apply and perform the rule on contemporary issues, and the approach the researcher uses in this study is the inductive, comparative, and analytical approach. This is to achieve the results of proving the authenticity of the rule and that it is applicable to jurists, and to clarify the extent of its relevance to the science of purposes and the practice of discipline jurisprudence during the application of this rule to know its impact on contemporary issues.
ISSN: 1319-0792

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.