| المستخلص: |
This research presents a manifestation of the term "inference" and the difference in its meaning, whether it is a special evidence, not a Qur'an, a Sunnah, a consensus or a measure of a bug, and a mental act taken by the beholder and forerunner in the jurisprudential branches to establish evidence and proof, What, or other meanings offered by some fundamentalists to investigate and weighting with the evacuation of the ambiguity that occurred because of the influence of some fundamentalists logical proposition, and this research goes to consider the general meaning of the reasoning, was mostly theoretical in the original evidence and dependency, with a description of each order and the course of view It is at the Malikiya and Koo In the controversial issues to provide further clarification and representation of the subject, and an illustration of the answer to the problematic approach of reasoning and its relationship to the dispute of jurisprudence or controversial issues; and has made it in three sections, the first section on the inference between being a special guide or mechanism and a guide to guide the evidence; The second and third of the evidence in the original evidence and then the dependency, after that a preliminary introduction to the subject and Conclusion.
Les actes de paroles, qui ont été objet de pragmatique chez J AUSTIN, forment un secteur de recherche linguistique sans être majeur, néanmoins on a constaté l’intercection entre pragmatique et actes de parole. Bien qu’AUSTIN n’ait pas pu arriver à établir une théorie d’acte de paroles, il a déterminé, des concepts centraux pour y arriver.
|
