المستخلص: |
The main goal of this study is showing the legislative controls governing the arbitration process in the administrative contracts which aims to achieve the maximum benefit of the arbitration system as a quick way to settle disputes without prejudice to the self-characteristics of administrative contracts which distinguish them from civil contracts. With this aim in mind, the researcher used the inductive analytical approach, in order to identify the legislative controls governing the arbitration process in the field of administrative contracts, and to know the extent to which these controls achieve their objectives or not. The researcher found that these controls are limited to two basic officers. The first is to obtain the approval of the competent minister, the second is that it is not permissible to delegate the competent minister to approve the arbitration clause. The researcher concludes with the need to tighten these rules regarding arbitration in contracts of an international character by obtaining the approval of the Council of Ministers, as well as not to exaggerate the conclusion of the arbitration clause in such contracts, with the need to train those responsible for the conclusion of the administrative contracts included in the arbitration clause.
|