520 |
|
|
|b The researcher strives to frame the concept of love within a foundational context based on what he calls; Loving manners. According to this foundation, he seeks to stand at the overlapping relationships between love and morals, and then discover the cognitive and structural entanglement between them, and the extent to which those overlap and entanglement are affected by the societal context of love within two main determinants, namely; Ethics of chivalry and the stations of mysticism and gratitude. The researcher adopted several questions, including main and sub questions in the research, and these questions are: Do you think, can we make the feelings of love a cognitive entry point, to consider the awareness of the reference guiding individual and collective behavior, and the extent of the impact of those feelings in regulating the consequences of human action in its moral dimension?. This question raises other questions, including: • Can we represent that emotional reference, while we strive to investigate the major questions that pertain to the type of life we like to live and its goals? What are the means by which Muslim lovers invoke, as they propose their moral conception of the kind of life they love? • Does love establish higher moral values, so that love, guided by it, becomes a reason for voluntary behavior in purifying and purifying souls, so that voluntary action is in harmony with duty? • Can the morals of love, such as; Altruism, sacrifice, compassion, empathy, patience and tolerance. Etc., and therefore, can the analytical vision of these ethics give us the ability to standardize and standardize human behavior? • Does the moral system that is based on knowledge of religion achieve a knowledge of the heart, emotional, be it mystical or mystical, to confirm its structural coherence? What is the significance of this system in establishing the morals of love on the one hand, and in consolidating the foundations of the societal moral dimension, on the other?
|