ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > The Arab Ordeal:>مارك
يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

The Arab Ordeal: Between Democratization and Islamization of the Region

المصدر: مجلة شؤون استراتيجية
الناشر: المركز المغربي للدراسات الاستراتيجية والعلاقات الدولية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Hoballah, Leila (Author)
المجلد/العدد: ع12
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: المغرب
التاريخ الميلادي: 2022
الشهر: أكتوبر
الصفحات: 297 - 334
DOI: 10.62489/2278-000-012-015
ISSN: 2665-8542
رقم MD: 1339588
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink
مواضيع:
الربيع العربي | التحول الديمقراطي | الإصلاح السياسي | الأخلاق السياسية
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Utility Ethics | Arab Spring | Western Hegemony | Islamic Fundamentalist | Legitimacy
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)     
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

2

حفظ في:
LEADER 02720nam a22002297a 4500
001 2096104
024 |3 10.62489/2278-000-012-015 
041 |a eng 
044 |b المغرب 
100 |9 710719  |a Hoballah, Leila  |e Author 
245 |a The Arab Ordeal:  |b Between Democratization and Islamization of the Region 
260 |b المركز المغربي للدراسات الاستراتيجية والعلاقات الدولية  |c 2022  |g أكتوبر 
300 |a 297 - 334 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b In this paper we are questioning the legitimacy of political reform in the Arab countries in the MENA region, that have been struggling between two projects; the “Creation of the New Middle East”, which represents the West hegemonic narrative, and “ Dawlat Al khilafah” which reflects the Islamic Fundamentalist religious hegemonic narrative. The hypothesis that has been examined in this paper, suggested that both projects have used the same frame of political ethics, demonstrated by the use of “hegemonic utility” ethical narrative. This led to questioning the legitimacy of the Arab Spring phenomena, and the type of political reform that has fallen under two dynamics of conflicting power relations. The Western hegemony, that divided the world into Global North and Global South, based on a theoretical framework that supports the idea of Western centralism, and orientalism narrative about the Arabic culture. This hegemony was depicted by the creation of democratization campaigns, the use of creative chaos strategies, and the deployment of soft power. On the other hand was the Islamic fundamentalists hegemony, that divide the world into Muslim and non Muslim, far enemies, the West, and near enemies, Arab countries, and the formation of Dawlat Al khilafah. This arguments is not an advocate of the conspiracy theory, it is more a way of showing that even opposite ideologies can hold the same ethics of hegemony and power, and that these concepts change their representation through history, proposing each time for a model of politics, that legitimise its power based on its own narrative and the calculation of utility behind each proposed idea. 
653 |a الربيع العربي  |a التحول الديمقراطي  |a الإصلاح السياسي  |a الأخلاق السياسية 
692 |b Utility Ethics  |b Arab Spring  |b Western Hegemony  |b Islamic Fundamentalist  |b Legitimacy 
773 |4 العلوم السياسية  |6 Political Science  |c 015  |f Maǧalaẗ šuʾwūn āstrātīǧyyaẗ  |l 012  |m ع12  |o 2278  |s مجلة شؤون استراتيجية  |v 000  |x 2665-8542 
856 |u 2278-000-012-015.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a EcoLink 
999 |c 1339588  |d 1339588 

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.