LEADER |
02079nam a22002297a 4500 |
001 |
2146529 |
024 |
|
|
|3 10.33855/0905-030-002-059
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
044 |
|
|
|b العراق
|
100 |
|
|
|9 562413
|a Al-Nasrawi, Rusul Dawood Salman
|e Author
|
245 |
|
|
|a Transitivity System in Two Selected Literary Texts:
|b A Discourse Analysis Study
|
260 |
|
|
|b جامعة بابل - كلية التربية للعلوم الإنسانية
|c 2023
|g حزيران
|
300 |
|
|
|a 1 - 40
|
336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
520 |
|
|
|b The present study investigates the Transitivity System in literary discourse from a discourse analysis perspective. The study aims at inspecting Transitivity System in construing different types of meanings in the two selected literary texts. To achieve the aims, Halliday’s Transitivity model (2014) is used to analyse two selected literary texts. According to Halliday’s Transitivity model, there are three fundamental components of a clause which are: participant, process, and circumstance. The study hypothesizes that: (1) Each literary text has a different dominant type of processes. (2) Some circumstances may act as participants. To verify these hypotheses, the two selected literary texts are analysed quantitatively and qualitatively based on the Hallidian model. The study reveals that both texts are of the same dominant type of process and hence refute the hypothesis. Moreover, the study concludes that some circumstances can serve as participants.
|
653 |
|
|
|a النصوص الأدبية
|a تحليل الخطاب
|a النقد الأدبي
|a علم اللغة الوظيفي
|
692 |
|
|
|b Transitivity System
|b Process
|b Process Types
|b Participants
|b Circumstances
|
773 |
|
|
|4 العلوم الإنسانية ، متعددة التخصصات
|6 Humanities, Multidisciplinary
|c 059
|e journal of Human Sciences
|f Maǧallaẗ bābil al-ʻulūm al-insāmiyyaẗ
|l 002
|m مج30, ع2
|o 0905
|s مجلة العلوم الانسانية
|v 030
|x 1992-2876
|
856 |
|
|
|u 0905-030-002-059.pdf
|
930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q n
|
995 |
|
|
|a HumanIndex
|
999 |
|
|
|c 1396214
|d 1396214
|