المستخلص: |
This research paper investigates the role of speech acts in persuasion through a pragmatic analysis of two influential speeches: Nelson Mandela's "I Am Prepared to Die" and Mahatma Gandhi's "Quit India." By examining the linguistic strategies employed by these iconic leaders, this study aims to shed light on how speech acts contribute to persuasive communication. The research adopts a qualitative approach, utilizing pragmatic analysis as the primary methodological framework, adopting Levinson's book on Pragmatics (1983). The speeches are analyzed in terms of speech act theory, which focuses on the illocutionary force and perlocutionary effects of utterances. Key concepts such as direct and indirect speech acts and rhetorical devices are explored to understand how these elements contribute to persuasive intent. The findings reveal that both Mandela and Gandhi strategically employ various speech acts to achieve their persuasive goals. Through direct speech acts, they assert their beliefs, express their determination, and call for action. Additionally, indirect speech acts are utilized to convey messages indirectly or implicitly, allowing for nuanced persuasion. Furthermore, rhetorical devices such as repetition and emotional appeals are identified as effective means of enhancing persuasive impact. These devices help create memorable phrases that resonate with the audience emotionally and intellectually. The implications of this study extend beyond historical analysis by providing insights into the pragmatic aspects of persuasion through speech acts. Understanding how influential leaders utilize language can inform contemporary communication practices in various domains such as politics, advertising, and public speaking.
|