العنوان بلغة أخرى: |
The Hanbalis Differentiation between Ignorance and Forgetfulness: Applied Original Study |
---|---|
المصدر: | مجلة البحوث الفقهية المعاصرة |
الناشر: | مؤسسة البحوث والدراسات الفقهية وعلوم القرآن الكريم الوقفية |
المؤلف الرئيسي: | الصقعوب، عبدالمجيد بن أحمد (مؤلف) |
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): | Al-Saqaoub, Abdul Majeed bin Ahmed |
المجلد/العدد: | مج34, ع121 |
محكمة: | نعم |
الدولة: |
السعودية |
التاريخ الميلادي: |
2023
|
التاريخ الهجري: | 1444 |
الشهر: | فبراير |
الصفحات: | 345 - 380 |
ISSN: |
1319-0792 |
رقم MD: | 1444733 |
نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
اللغة: | العربية |
قواعد المعلومات: | IslamicInfo |
مواضيع: | |
رابط المحتوى: |
الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها. |
LEADER | 03136nam a22002177a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 2190815 | ||
041 | |a ara | ||
044 | |b السعودية | ||
100 | |9 765696 |a الصقعوب، عبدالمجيد بن أحمد |e مؤلف |g Al-Saqaoub, Abdul Majeed bin Ahmed | ||
245 | |a تفريق الحنابلة بين الجهل والنسيان: |b دراسة تأصيلية تطبيقية | ||
246 | |a The Hanbalis Differentiation between Ignorance and Forgetfulness: |b Applied Original Study | ||
260 | |b مؤسسة البحوث والدراسات الفقهية وعلوم القرآن الكريم الوقفية |c 2023 |g فبراير |m 1444 | ||
300 | |a 345 - 380 | ||
336 | |a بحوث ومقالات |b Article | ||
520 | |b Knowledge is a condition of accountability, and ignorance is one of its impediments. - That everyone who works with something must learn the judgment of Allah in it so that he does not fall into sin ignorantly, and whoever does not learn is sinful for not learning. - Ignorance is only considered an excuse if it does not result from a shortening on the part of the accountable person, i.e.: the accountable has no option to ward it off. - Anyone who knows that something is forbidden and is ignorant of its consequences is not excused due to this ignorance. - If an ignorant person has to be punished, then the punishment is dropped from being applied to him, but that does not prevent him from being punished for his failure to learn. - Ignorance is often an excuse in prohibitions, but it does not deviate from the mandated person from the custody of the commanded rules, so he demands them whenever he knows the command of Allah- Glory be to Him. - Those charged- in disputes- in terms of accepting an apology for ignorance or not, are divided into three categories: - Whoever attains knowledge with difficulty: such as someone who grew up in a distant desert or converted to Islam in a land of war, then his apology of ignorance in all matters is accepted.- Whoever grew up in Islamic countries, but is preoccupied with something other than knowledge, such as if he is one of the craftsmen and others, then his apology is accepted except for the fundamentals and the obvious of the religion. - That he is a jurist who is busy with knowledge: his apology is not accepted based on the apparent appearance and prioritizing it over the original. -. Everyone who is said to have no excuse for ignorance in a specific matter, and he died before he knew about it, then it is hoped that Allah’s forgiveness will not take him to account, but rather he will be held accountable for his failure to learn if he was negligent. | ||
653 | |a الفقه الإسلامي |a المذاهب الفقهية |a المسائل الخلافية |a باب الأعذار | ||
773 | |4 الفقه الإسلامي |6 Islamic Jurisprudence |c 007 |e Contemporary Jurisprudence Research Journal |f Maǧalaẗ al-boḥoṯ al-fiqhyaẗ al-moʼaṣeraẗ |l 121 |m مج34, ع121 |o 0424 |s مجلة البحوث الفقهية المعاصرة |v 034 |x 1319-0792 | ||
856 | |u 0424-034-121-007.pdf | ||
930 | |d n |p y |q n | ||
995 | |a IslamicInfo | ||
999 | |c 1444733 |d 1444733 |