| المستخلص: |
The beginning of the existence of international humanitarian law was with the issuance of the Geneva Convention, and this agreement arose at the beginning to improve the condition of the wounded in the armies and in the field due to the bad conditions that the soldiers were exposed to. Except for ferocity and work under any circumstances, and this agreement is the cornerstone on which other agreements were built that take into account the humanitarian situation of soldiers and civilians and wage war within certain limits and have controls to preserve human life. Also, the concept of international law is based on protecting people from modern weapons in the first place, especially in times of war. Because his mission is to protect civilians anywhere in the world, which is the reason for which he was found, especially after hitting Japan with two atomic bombs that claimed the lives of millions of civilians and soldiers. And the field, due to the bad conditions that the soldiers were subjected to, and there was no attention to the humanitarian conditions in a field that does not pay attention to the feelings and conditions in which the soldiers are placed. It knows nothing but ferocity and action under any circumstances, and this agreement is the cornerstone on which other agreements that take into account the humanitarian situation of the soldiers were built. And civilians and wage war within certain limits and have controls in order to preserve human life. The first thing that comes to mind is what kind of non-conventional weapons the first Geneva Protocol opened the door to the adoption of the 1981 Convention on the Prohibition of the Use of Certain Weapons That Can Generate Excessive Pain or Indiscriminate Damage, and this Treaty entered into force in In 1983 AD, it is the first treaty dealing with the status of legal rooting of conventional weapons. This agreement contains at the same time provisions for international humanitarian law and others for armament control. What arouses the mind, draws attention, and makes the mind see the position of international law as a contradictory position, as it prohibits biological and chemical weapons, but follows an ambiguous position on nuclear weapons. The issue of autonomous weapons has raised a great deal of controversy in the international jurisprudence and legal circles. Given the seriousness of these technologies and the threats, they pose to civilians and innocent people in areas of armed conflict.
|
