ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا









The Influence of Cognitive Bias on Professional Judgment in Auditing: An Empirical Study from Egypt

المصدر: المجلة العلمية للدراسات التجارية والبيئية
الناشر: جامعة قناة السويس - كلية التجارة بالاسماعيلية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Abdel Khaleq, Samah Ahmed Mohamed (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج14, ع4
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2023
الشهر: أكتوبر
الصفحات: 150 - 238
ISSN: 2090-3782
رقم MD: 1504589
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EcoLink
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Auditor Professional Judgment | Cognitive Biases | Self-Serving Bias | Cognitive Dissonance | Jump to a Conclusion | Sunk-Cost Fallacy | Audit Quality
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

1

حفظ في:
LEADER 02826nam a22002177a 4500
001 2248238
041 |a eng 
044 |b مصر 
100 |a Abdel Khaleq, Samah Ahmed Mohamed  |e Author  |9 798746 
245 |a The Influence of Cognitive Bias on Professional Judgment in Auditing:  |b An Empirical Study from Egypt 
260 |b جامعة قناة السويس - كلية التجارة بالاسماعيلية  |c 2023  |g أكتوبر 
300 |a 150 - 238 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b Audits of financial statements necessitate the utilization of professional judgment, as the procedures and the strategies outlined in auditing standards lack straightforward and clear-cut instructions for auditors to follow when conducting an audit. Although auditors are expected to adopt thorough thinking methodologies when making decisions, there is a high probability that they may not make the right decision due to the cognitive biases and judgmental traps. This study aims to examine how significant psychological biases affect auditors‘ professional judgment when conducting an audit. Based on recent literature in the fields of accounting, auditing, and psychology, the researcher outlines four distinct biases that impact the quality of professional judgment for external auditors. To test the study hypothesis, the researcher collected data from 118 certified auditors for survey analysis. The study‘s main finding is that cognitive biases such as self- serving bias, cognitive dissonance, jump to a conclusion and sunk-cost fallacy can negatively affect auditor‘s professional judgment. The study indicates that understanding the impact of cognitive biases on auditor independence and professional judgment is critical for enhancing auditor professional judgment and improving audit quality accordingly. The study recommends that auditors should have adequate training to identify and manage their cognitive biases. Also, professional organizations and standards setter should develop procedures to minimize the impact of cognitive biases on auditors' professional judgment. 
653 |a التدقيق المالي  |a الحكم المهني  |a جودة التدقيق 
692 |b Auditor Professional Judgment  |b Cognitive Biases  |b Self-Serving Bias  |b Cognitive Dissonance  |b Jump to a Conclusion  |b Sunk-Cost Fallacy  |b Audit Quality 
773 |4 إدارة الأعمال  |4 دراسات بيئية  |6 Business  |6 Environmental Studies  |c 014  |e Journal of Commercial & Environmental Studies (JCES)  |f Al-Mağallah Al-ʿilmiyyaẗ Lil Dirāsāt Al-Tuğāriyyaẗ wa Al-Buḥūṯ Al-Bī’iyyaẗ  |l 004  |m مج14, ع4  |o 0335  |s المجلة العلمية للدراسات التجارية والبيئية  |v 014  |x 2090-3782 
856 |u 0335-014-004-014.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a EcoLink 
999 |c 1504589  |d 1504589