ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا









الهيمنة الاستعمارية وميكانيزمات العولمة: مقاربة أنثروبولوجية

المصدر: مجلة العلوم التربوية والنفسية
الناشر: الجمعية العراقية للعلوم التربوية والنفسية
المؤلف الرئيسي: عبدالباقي، عبدالوهاب خزعل (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Abdel Baqi, Abdel Wahab Khazaal
المجلد/العدد: ع122
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2016
الصفحات: 442 - 485
ISSN: 2077-8694
رقم MD: 1535600
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: EduSearch
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
استعمار | انثروبولوجيا | عولمة
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

2

حفظ في:
المستخلص: Remains the question of relative concepts in the social sciences continues as long as they are subject to relativity continuousness cultural terms of the correlation provisions of the standards of Norms cultural subject in turn to the fundamental values of, which reflect the goals, no doubt in the submission criteria to the amendment and change in harmony with the orientations of particular cultural group is determined by social forces in terms of are all subject to social change In spite of the dependence of social sciences to other that regard pure in there terms trying imitate a simulation meant to precision and control experimental character of the natural sciences; but they managed to achieve a percentage of control Scientific despite the difficult substantive chapter between (the researcher) and (subject matter) , but problematic concept in such large terms Terms carved culturally Culturally virtue with consensus judgments based on intuition (cultural difference) ; and if this difference a reality in the culture Oasis (cultures sub) Sub-Cultures obviously be much greater between heterogeneous cultures. If we accept- of argument- divide the world into (northern) and (South) there is no doubt there is a difference evident between social science researchers to agree on what you mean by conventions certain if they are subject to the provisions is a liberal value judgment Free Values, including the (colonial) Colonization and globalization Globalization They are the focus of this study, it is natural that there be a bias (justifiably) seen (the need) colonization of the other (lower) from the (justified) Urbanization and Civilization and spectrum in return for invitation thinking that there should be freedom Liberty and independence and non-piece, and this does not prevent the existence of Invitations are limited to justify the need to colonize their country, as is the case- for example- call Anthropologist Kenyan Ali Mazrui's view the need to colonize Africa because the peoples of Africa is able to manage itself, it is natural that the longer the call (treason and national) for the culture and (scientific thinking) for cultures (North). The reality of globalization and the emergence of a controversial intellectual mutated and views about them in terms of being a universal human need to lead to world peace and social well-being or a pattern of it returned in a new form of colonialism. And try this study to answer this question, as well as consideration of the theses centered on two concepts (colonialism) (Globalization) approach that anthropological, have been selected two senior anthropologists who looked from the two first local is Dr. Qais and the other Gerard Lecrik as representing the other (North) trying to show the extent of substantive consideration of anthropology in this study placed by virtue of asymmetric overlap between what is social and political, economic and religious...Each of these levels may be or faraway as determinants of subjective or object.

ISSN: 2077-8694

عناصر مشابهة