| LEADER |
02771nam a22001937a 4500 |
| 001 |
0600566 |
| 044 |
|
|
|b مصر
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a العتيق، عبدالسلام عبدالفتاح عبدالعظيم
|g Alateeq, Abdelsalam Abdelfattah Abdelazim
|e مؤلف
|9 264096
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a الاساس للاختلاف في تعريف القياس
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b دار الافتاء المصرية
|c 2010
|g أكتوبر
|m 1431
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 78 - 109
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b This research paper is a study of the reasons that have led to differences of opinion between legal theorists concerning the definition of qiyas [analogical reasoning]. It concludes with an attempt to offer a definition acceptable to scholars of jurisprudence. \ It is divided into three chapters: \ The lexical definition of qiyas. An elucidation of its lexical meanings and their relation to its technical meaning. \ The technical definition of qiyas, consisting of an introduction outlining the various scholarly stances. Thereafter, a separate section is devoted to each factor leading to a difference of opinions with regards to the definition of qiyas: \ -The first section discusses whether the definition of qiyas is available through a formal logical definition, or a description. \ -The second discusses whether qiyas is an action of the mujtahid or the creation of the Legislator. \ -The third outlines the opinions of the musawwiba (those who believe all instances of ijtihad are correct) and mukhatti a (those who believe that some instances of ijtihad may be incorrect). \ -The fourth outlines the ratio legis and the ruling for theoretical and substantive legal issues. \ -The fifth elucidates what is expressed by the subject and object of qiyas. \ -The sixth expounds whether the ratio legis is absolute or restricted. \ -The seventh takes into consideration whether the mujtahid>s point of view is restricted to the definition of qiyas. \ Each reason has been followed up with an exposition of its effects in relation to the definition of qiyas. \ The definition of qiyas selected by the author, and its explication are further divided into two sections comprising: \ -The definition selected and its elucidation. \ -The objections that may be levelled against this definition, and the refutation of those objections. \ The conclusion re-states the most important results reached.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a القياس
|a الفقه الاسلامي
|a اصول الفقه
|a الاختلافات الفقهية
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 الفقه الإسلامي
|6 Islamic Jurisprudence
|c 004
|l 006
|m ع 6
|o 0783
|s مجلة دار الإفتاء المصرية
|t Journal of the Egyptian House of Ifta
|v 000
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 0783-000-006-004.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q y
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a IslamicInfo
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 167121
|d 167121
|
