ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > دراسة الآراء النحوية والمصطلحا...>الوصف

دراسة الآراء النحوية والمصطلحات في كتاب ( شرح قطر الندى وبل الصدى )

المصدر: مجلة الكلية الإسلامية الجامعة
الناشر: الجامعة الإسلامية
المؤلف الرئيسي: جعفر، إقبال عبدالصاحب (مؤلف)
المجلد/العدد: مج 4, ع 11
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2010
التاريخ الهجري: 1431
الصفحات: 247 - 271
DOI: 10.51837/0827-004-011-002
ISSN: 1997-6208
رقم MD: 190276
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
ابن هشام ، عبدالله بن يوسف بن أحمد ، ت. 761 هـ | النحو | الإعراب | كتاب قطر الندى و بل الصدى | اختلاف النحاة | المذاهب النحوية | سيبويه ، عمرو بن عثمان ، ت 180 هـ | اللغة العربية
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)      PDF (نص)      HTML
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

61

حفظ في:
المستخلص: Through my study to the stated views and the scholars whom the writer depended their ideas in his book, I found that he mentioned many of them and elaborated those views accepting some of them and rejecting other on proper bases on which our language is established. He was sometimes viewing those ideas to scholars; thus, he accepted some scholar's view and rejected another scholar's view, or his rejection and acceptance of those views were hard. there were views that were stated without his acceptance or rejection, they were stated just a matter of mentioning them and those were a lot. I found many scholars were included in his book some of them belong to Al_Kufa school some to Al_Basra school, and others were just representing their views. He depended on a lot of Al_Kufa school's scholars and he referred to them in his writing though his rejection to their views were more than his acceptance to them; thus, he sometimes accepted them , and others without comment. Concerning Al_Basra school, he included less scholars than Al_Kufa scholars, but his acceptance towards them was little greater, and his rejection to them was lesser. He sometimes did comment on their views which is concluded that he trended little to Al_Basra scholars, but he did not ignore them which is clear in the detail of the research. He was sometimes going into detail with those views, and sometimes he was summarizing them, but he was expressing his ideas. The importance is that the researcher of his book " exploration of Qatar Al_Nada and wetness of each " get a lot of scholar's views and their styles in commenting on and various syntactic trends. I see Ibn Husham states terms from Al_Basra and Al_Kufa schools; thus, for the completion of this research, those terms are to be studied with the sources that they come from as required though the terms of Al_Basra school were more than Al_Kufa school and in spite of stating Al_Kufa school terms and that he did not ignore them; thus, the research has dealt with different views and terms as possible as it could.
ISSN: 1997-6208

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.