| LEADER |
03698nam a22002657a 4500 |
| 001 |
0675609 |
| 041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b الأردن
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a الحمد، جواد
|g Al-Hamad, Jawad
|e مؤلف
|9 98712
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a السياسات العربية و الفلسطينية تجاه الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي
|
| 246 |
|
|
|a Arab & Palestinian Policies Towards Arab-Israeli Conflict Report
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط
|c 2008
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 137 - 140
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b The symposium discussed thoroughly four main pivots. The first one addressed the Palestinian policy toward the conflict: the required policies to develop the Palestinian side in the conflict and to enable it to participate in conflict determination in cooperation with Arab and international sides. The participants discussed these policies in regard with several factors; the resistance of the Palestinian people and its internal unity, the Intifada and the resistance against the occupation, the peace process and the political settlement, the Palestinian National Authority and the Palestinian Liberation organization, the amendment and the internal development, and finally the political, media, and the external relationship. The second pivot discussed the formal Arab policies toward the conflict. The participants emphasized that the origin of the Palestinian Cause goes back to Zionism and colonialism conspiracy on the western and international levels. It initiated from Bazel conference in 1897, and then it continued as the result of Balfour Declaration. Thus, Palestine was put under British mandatory. The participants indicated that the Arab weakness and dependence are the main factors which enlarged that conspiracy. The third pivot clarified deeply the policies of the Arab parties toward the conflict. The participants indicated that the policies of national parties emerged from the faith that considered Palestine as an Arab country; just for Arabs. They added that the current struggle is in fact a struggle for existence not for borders. Hence, Israel exerts its efforts to obstruct the comprehensive development in the Arab World and to weaken its unity. The participants also considered the agreements which were held between Israel and Palestine or between Israel and other Arab countries as surrender agreements. The fourth pivot addressed the Israeli and Arab policies toward Gaza siege and its prospects. The participants indicated that Gaza siege is related to the resistance; since if Hamas responded to the quaternion conditions, the siege would not be there. Three subjects were discussed in this chapter; the oppression of the Palestinian people (killing, displacement and starving...), the resistance, and finally the impact of the siege on the Palestinian people. In the conclusions, the participations presented several important recommendations.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a السياسة الخارجية
|a القضية الفلسطينية
|a الصراع العربي الإسرائيلي
|a العالم العربي
|a النظم السياسية
|a العلاقات السياسية
|
| 700 |
|
|
|9 556188
|a جبران، علي
|e م. مشارك
|
| 700 |
|
|
|9 438318
|a العمودي، عمر
|e م. مشارك
|
| 700 |
|
|
|9 154638
|a الفهد، خالد
|e م. مشارك
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 العلوم السياسية
|6 Political Science
|c 009
|e Middle East Studies Journal
|f Maǧallaẗ dirāsāt šarq awsaṭiyyaẗ
|l 044
|m مج 12, ع 44
|o 0836
|s مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية
|v 012
|x 1811-8208
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 0836-012-044-009.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a HumanIndex
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a EcoLink
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 202287
|d 202287
|
