| المستخلص: |
القول المخرج هو: الحكم المستنبط في مسألة جزئية لم يرد فيها نص عن الإمام، بالاستناد إلى أصوله أو قواعده جريا على طريقته في الاستدلال، أو إلحاقها بما يشبهها من المسائل المروية عنه بوجود معنى ما نص عليه فيما سكت عنه، أو على بما خالفها في الحكم. وقد عرف التخريج مجموعة من المصطلحات ذات الصلة منها: قياس قول الإمام. ومقتضى القول. والقياس في المذهب. والاستقراء. والوجه. ولا يخرج المخرج عن المجتهد في المذهب المتقيد بمذهب إمام معين، فيسير على طريقته في الفتوى والاستدلال، ولا يخرج عن رأيه فيما أفتى فيه، وما سكت عنه الإمام يجتهد فيه على طريقته. وقد اشترط العلماء لبلوغ الفقيه درجة المخرجين: معرفته بقواعد إمامه الأصولية والفقهية، واطلاعه على مآخذ الأحكام. وأهليته للتخريج. وعلمه بالفقه وأصوله وأدلة الأحكام تفصيلاً، بصيراً بمسالك الأقيسة والمعاني، متبحرا في الفروع، متمرسا على التخريج والاستنباط. والقول المخرج تصح نسبته إلى إمام المذهب، وتجوز الفتوى به، ويجوز للقضاة تقليد فقهاء التخريج ومن دونهم، تحقيقا للمصلحة ودرءا للمفسدة الحاصلة عند شغور منصب القضاء.
The conclusion of this study: 1. the mokhraj say is: contriver rule in a partial issue missed a text from Imam, based on the principles or minor in accordance with his own way of reasoning, or append it with similar issues mentioned by him, with existing meaning of what he spoke of and what he didn't, or with what he disagreed in the judgment." 2. the takhreej was defined as the set of terms related research revealed some of it as: 1. Measuring the words of Imam 2. requisites of the say 3. Measurement in the doctrine 4. the Baji's Extrapolation 4. And some added the face. 3. the directed term Does not come out from the Assiduous in doctrine and which is defined as: "who adhere to the doctrine of a certain Imam in originals and branches, or in the originals only, so he takes his way in the advisory opinion and reasoning, and do not deviate from his opinion in what the imam spoke of, and what the imam didn't speak of it Assiduous on his own way ", and scientists have been conditioned to reach Feqihia the degree of mokhrejin set of conditions. 4. And they conditioned to take the mokhraj saying two types of conditions: First, general conditions, and second special conditions. 5. the Search came out with six pictures of the mokhraj say 6. And of the issue of basing the "mokhraj say" to the imam, and expressed as well by their question: Is it correct to base the mokhraj say to imam ? And the search concluded that basing the mokhraj say to the imam's doctrine not to the Imam himself. 7. And some of the issues that the difference was based upon in the proportion of the mokhraj say to the Imam, sentenced fatwa to mokhraj say, which suggest that the fatwa based on the mokhraj say is permissible, and that what people did from long ago. 8. The scientists differed in the judiciary by the mokhraj say, does the judge sentence basing on it or not?, And the SEARCH of the sentence by the mokhraj say come down to yow issues: First: the inauguration of the not assiduous absolute judiciary. The second: requiring the not assiduous judge by a certain doctrine in his provisions. Which prevail in the matter that it is permissible to point the judiciary to the Jurists of "takreej" and those who are below them in rank, Pursue interests and ward off harm that occurs by the vacancy of the judiciary positions.
|
