المستخلص: |
يقوم هذا البحث على دراسة نونية ابن زيدون ت (463 ه) ونونية الصفدي ت (696ه) المعارضة لها. وقد ارتأينا أن تكون الدراسة (موازنة) بين كلتا النونيتين من حيث تبيان أوجه التشابه والاختلاف بينهما وقد خرج البحث بنتائج هي: أن المعارضة ناقصة بالغرض إذ أن نونية ابن زيدون كانت في (النسيب) أما نونية الصفدي فخرجت إلى (الرثاء) وهذا يعني أن الفراق مختلف في النونيتين فهو مؤقت في الأولى وأبدي في الثانية وخرجت الدراسة إلى أن القوافي غير موحدة عند كليهما فضلا عن كثرة التضاد عند ابن زيدون وقلته عند الصفدي أما ما يتعلق بالتكرار فهو ظاهر في القصيدتين وان اختلف في أنواعه وأخيرًا فان القصيدتين قد وظفتا النداء على نحوِ لافت.
This search is standing on Nonyat Abin Zaydoon studying (463A.D) and AL Safadi Nonyat in (696 A.D) which is opposite for it. We have seen that this study to be (balance) between these both Nonayateen from the aspects of similarity and differences between them, and this search concluded to the following results: This opposition is cont complete in the purpose, cause Abin Zaydoon Nonyat was in (Al Naseeb). And Al Safadi Nonyat discovered that (elegy) means that the separation is different in the Nonyateen, so it was a temporary in the first and permanent. Also this study has concluded that rhymes were not uncombined at both of them. In addition on the muchness of contradiction in Ibin Zaydoon's view and littleness in Al Safadi's view. And the study has concluded that the rhymes were not unified in both poets, in addition to the muchness of contradictions in Ibin Zaydoona and littliness in Al Safadi. As to repetitions is apparent in both poems even if it was differ in its types in each poem. At last these two poems were employed the calling in attracting attention.
|