| 520 |
|
|
|a أنصب البحث على دراسة موقف محمد أركون من ثبوت الوحي؛ فتم عرض موقفه هذا من خلال عرض الأصول الفكرية التي بنى عليها موقفه من ثبوت الوحي، وموقفه من ثبوته، وتظهر أهمية البحث في كونه يجلي موقف أحد أبرز الحداثيين المعاصرين – أدعياء الاجتهاد والعصرانية والتنويرية – من ثبوت الوحي، ومناقشته مناقشة علمية مؤصلة بالكتاب والسنة وفهم السلف. وجاءت الدراسة في مقدمة ومدخل ومبحثين وخاتمة، من أهم ما تناولته التعريف بصاحب الموقف، والأصول الفكرية لمنهجه الذي بنى عليه رأيه في ثبوت الوحي، وموقفه من ثبوته، وتفنيد رأيه في ذلك تفنيدًا علميًا، وانتهت الدراسة إلى أن أركون وهو يعيد قراءة نصوص الوحي، لم يلتزم بأسس ومسلماته وأصول السلف في فهم نصوصه، بل اعتمد على نظريات ومناهج غربية مجافية لطبيعة الوحي الذي يختلف عن سائر النصوص التي أبدعها البشر، وكان من نتيجته: أنه قطع صلة الوحي بالله وعزله عن مرجعيته وقائله، وأسقط حجيته ونبذ قدسيته، ونزع صفة الوحي عنه، وأخضعه للنقد والدراسة، وأفرغه من معناه وأخضعه للفهم البشري القاصر، وجعله يحوي معان محجوبة، وأسرار باطنة لا يكشف عنها إلا قواعده الحداثية، ولذا فإني أنبه من خلال هذه الدراسة على خطر من يعيدون فهم نصوص الشرع على ثوابت المعتقد، وأوصي بضرورة الاهتمام بطرحهم، وتفنيده تفنيدًا علميًا، تجنيبًا للناس من شطحاتهم الفكرية، وصونًا للإسلام من فكرهم المغلوط.
|b The study focused on Mohammed Arkoun position on the revelation authenticity. It outlined this position through the presentation of the intellectual basis he relied on to form his ideas about the revelation authenticity. The importance of this study lies in its demonstration of the position of one of the most eminent contemporary advocate for modernity - those who claim to have independent reasoning (diligence) and enlightenment and contemporary views- regarding revelation authenticity and in its scientific debate and argument which is based on the Quran, the Sunnah "i.e. the teachings of the prophet”, and the understanding of the scholars of the first generations of the Muslims. The study consists of an introduction, preface, two chapters and a concluding chapter. It contained a short biography of Arkoun, the theoretical background for the methodology he relied on to form an understanding regarding revelation authenticity, his position regarding revelation authenticity, and proving him wrong in his conclusions by following a scientific approach in tracing his arguments. The study concluded that Mohammed Arkoun in his re-reading of the revelation did not abide by the rules, axioms, and foundations the first generation of Muslims used to deal with the revelation's texts; rather he relied on western theories and methods that are not consistent with the nature of the revelation- which is different of any human text. As a result of the previous approach he cut the bond between the revelation text and God. He dealt with the revelation text as if it is written by humans, and hence removed its sacredness, and denounced its authority. He treated the revelation text as he would treat any other text. He applied his techniques of analyzing the text and criticizing it to the Quran. He voided the Quran of its teachings and meaning. He claimed that the Quran has hidden secrets and disclosed meanings which cannot be understood but through his contemporary rules of Modernity. Therefore, ّI would like to warn through this paper from the danger of the people who are trying to understand and interpret the Sharia’s texts without paying attention to the undisputed rules and fundamental facts that there is an already consensus on. I would like also to recommend that we pay close attention to their theories and ideas by showing through valid scientific arguments their wrong conclusions and findings to protect the public from their incorrect understanding and safeguard Islam from their erroneous thoughts
|
