| المستخلص: |
التراث الشعري عبق بشعراء طبقت شهرتهم الآفاق، وكتب لشعرهم الشيوع والخلود؛ وقد انبرى بعض النقاد لشرح شعرهم، وبيان معانيه، وتأويل ما يرمون إليه؛ لذا كثرت التآليف، وتباينت الرؤى، ولا ريب في أن شعر المتنبي ثمار يانعة، بيد أن معانيه قطوف غير دانية؛ لذا حظي شعره شرحاً ونقداً، مدحاً وقدحاً، بما لم يحظ به شاعر آخر، حتى عُدَّ ذلك من سعادته. وقد بز شرح ابن جني الشروح جميعها؛ إذ افتتحت الشروح بفسره، فتلقفه من بعده من النقاد فحصاً وتمحيصاً، فبعضهم حصر مدونته لنقد شرح ابن جني فحسب، وبعضهم شرح شعر المتنبي وضمن مدونته ما أورده ابن جني في شرحه إما تأييداً أو رفضاً. وقد أفرد الزوزني مدونته لنقد ما جاء عند ابن جني في الفسر فحسب، وقد اتخذ بضع آليات اتكأ عليها في تأويله واستدراكاته عليه. وتحاول هذه الدراسة الكشف عن هذه الآليات التي اتخذها الزوزني في قشره للفسر.
The heritage of poetry was incensed by poets that had been superior. Their poetry had been a sign of publicity and mortality. Some critics did a huge effort by devoting their time to clarify and explain the meaning. In addition to that, they had been trying to interpret the intentions of this poetry type. Thus, many written works with different views had addressed these types. There is no doupt that Al-Mutanabi’s poetry had been one from the most fruitful literary works, but the meanings of his poems had been farfetched. Therefore, his poetry had been explained, criticized, praised and dispraised more than anyone else. This had considered to be a sort of his happiness. Iben Jenni’s explanation had been outclassed because of his book Al-Faser which had been the first one in that field. After that, it had been examined and scrutinized by the rest of critics. Some of them had criticized Iben Jenni’s explanation and the other had explained Al-Mutanabi’s poetry then they had included Ibn Jenni’s explanation either to agree or disagree with him. Al-Zawzani in his book Qasher Al-Faser had criticized Ibn Jenni’s Faser by using certain mechanisms while interpreting the text trying to present its weaknesses. This study attempts to explore these mechanisms.
|
