ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > التصور والتصديق في العربية...>الوصف

التصور والتصديق في العربية

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Imagination & Emphasis in Arabic Language
المؤلف الرئيسي: العاني، هناء إسماعيل إبراهيم هويدي (مؤلف)
مؤلفين آخرين: الحديثي، خديجة عبدالرزاق عبدالقادر (مشرف)
التاريخ الميلادي: 2005
موقع: بغداد
التاريخ الهجري: 1426
الصفحات: 1 - 287
رقم MD: 551808
نوع المحتوى: رسائل جامعية
اللغة: العربية
الدرجة العلمية: رسالة ماجستير
الجامعة: جامعة بغداد
الكلية: كلية الاداب
الدولة: العراق
قواعد المعلومات: Dissertations
مواضيع:
التصور اللغوي | اللغة العربية
رابط المحتوى:
صفحة العنوان     
المستخلص     
قائمة المحتويات     
24 صفحة الأولى     

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: This research is concentrated on a subject from subjects of Symantec of grammar which is : (Imagination & Emphasis in Arabic language) & T tired to separate between structures of Imagination & structures of emphasis to clear the rules & principles which have Scientific & Rational formula for each one . - My research is restricted on these in hope that the studier will find what benefits him concerning semantic of grammar & what will appear to him about the role of the semantic or "meanings science" in the art of speech & the better of it. So I desired that this research must be near university , so I put a preface to it carrying the title (for Khaber & Ensha'a for interoperation & its articles). - The research is divided is into three chapters, The first carrying the title "Imagination" which comes in four parts; In the first I put the development of Imagination from the linguistic semantic to term semantic among the grammaticals & in the second I talked about the role of "Hamzaa" articles . & the third part is dedicated for syllables of namic intronegation which asked for imagination . & in the fourth part which I called (Telling in the interrogative Imagination) , I talked here about telling wich "A'ai" & with "ma'an". - While in the second chapter which carried the title "Emphasis" which lies in 4 parts also ; The first part was about emphasis as meaning & term passing through its rules & principles among the grammatical & tallcatives . with speech about its from I.e: the positive emphasis , negative emphasis & referring to the articles which point to it. - The second part is for the prepositions of believing & emphasis beginning from the dual prepositions which contain (Ee'a) & (La) then the three prepositions which contain (Agaal), (Enn), (Bayal), (Bala), (gallel), (gaarer) & (Naam) & lastly the four prepositions which is especially for refusing which contain (Ella) & (Kula). - The third part is for the meanings of (Am) & its positions in which I talked about the types of (Am) which contain: continues (Am) & separated (Am) & I also talked about (Am) which is probable for continuation & separation so I talked about the (excess Am) & lastly I mentioned the (Am) which is known in some of languages. - The 4th part is for equalization between what is special for interrogative (Hamzaa) & what is special for (Haal) through clearing of likelihood & different between the two. - While in the third chapter which carried the title (compensating meanings for structure of Imagination & structures of emphasis) which I took in two major parts which are : the intronegation in (Khabber) meaning & intronegation in (Enshaa) meaning & I Ended research that the subject of (Imaginatuion & emphasis in Arabic language) is one of the difficult & long subjects but the grammar articles separated between intronegention about the singles & intronegation about ratio in naming only (because they name introgation about comprehension of (the sigle) & Knowing of it as imagination & they name intronegation about ratio & knowing of it as emphasis & the principles in separation between the intronegation while asked.

- For (Imagination) & the intronegation which asked emphasis which is. - Intronegative Imagination : that which followed by continues (Am) not the separated & the intronegative emphasis : which comes after it the separated & not the continues (Am). • The major results of our research about (Imagination & emphasis in Arabic language) are : 1. The settlement of Imagination & Emphasis terms in the 6th lanual century by the (sakaky) after separation of arts & Science each a part & the domination of argumental trend on (key of Science) & winning of mind & rational view . 2. Every imagination is preceded by emphasis . 3. (Saebaweea) have put ways of introduction in the intronegation by (Hamzaa) but Abdul- kahber Al- Gerganni added to it analysis about the witnesses & example & opposed (Saebaweea) in animpatot root which is : he sees that if the doubr is about who is the doer ? So he must come in front ……. but if the doubt as about the verb by itself so the verb must come in front so the beginning with name from this the rule of grammatical come which said that which that which follows intronegative articles is the responsible that which follows articles is the responsible on the true intronegation or in the false or compensatory intronegation . 4. The use of articles or (named) of intronegation was for summary because their use can substitute for the long talk if we need to use the preposition of intronegation (Al-hamzaa) on its position , The intronegation hamzaa cannot surround fully with there names for asking for imagination for the asked for with them . 5. The intronegation has the beginning of speech , so item any thing can not be come before it because if anything comes before it a phrase , it will lose the meaning of intronegation . 6. any of the names of intronegation will not work from these which come before it except drawing positions or the added because delay of the drawer from drawn is not possible because the drawer & the drown are one word can come before such as the added & the added on it. 7. One of the traces of drawing prepositions also if they enter delete its (Alef) in cases when there is no stopping, but in cases of stopping m we must delete the (alef) & put (haa) such as our word : (Amma), (Bemma)m (Femma) & the reason for this deletion is for the difference between intronegation & telling (Ma.). 8. From the opinions of first grammaticals & their followers who are late or modern that the intronegative (Haal) don't enter into the negative phrases on (sentences), but I found a talk to the poet Omar ben Kame'aa – from illiterate times – in which (Haal) entered into a negative phrase or (sentences) , i.e the introgenation came behind contents of the negative phrase & this assured that (Haal) is not only for affirmative sentences & this assured that some specially in the ancient poetry in which (Haal) entered into negative phrases.

9. (Naam) is the mother of believing & emphasizing prepositions because it entered it upon telling & intronegation, negative & positive phrase so it has the benefit of believing what came before it whether it is negative or positive in telling & intronegation but it is for (Mubaarad) is for all the talk without refusing – while (Balaa) will not come except after refused & its use for emphasizing answer is few because the origin is the use of (Namm) while (Laa) will not come except after answer to refuse the positive or assured state & not for refusing the refusal state & (Agaal) is such as (Naam) will be as emphasis for the teller & knowing for the told & a promise for the asked & some put her for telling & not for intronegation or asking & so the prepositions of believe & emphasis are diverse because diversity of meaning . 10. Seperated (Am) consideredby Basaraians as (Bal) which is for objection with (Hamzaa) while Kufians permitted consideration of separated (Am) as (Bal) alone & only a small number of Basraians saw that opinion . also separed "Am" as seemed o me considered as "Bal" with "Hamzaa" in some situations with safety of language but consideration of it as "Bal" with " Hamzaa" impossible in some situations because this will spoil the meaning. As "Am" enlead into another interoperation article so considered at that time as "Bal" alone. 11. Emphasis in verbal sentences is exceeded while it is little in namic sentences because the refusal and affirming an directed to meaning and happenings which are the important in verbs and not to the selves which are important in names. 12. Denying is of 2 types: True & False denying and those two denying are special for " Hamzaa". If the denying was to day happening of some thing this is the meaning of refusal which is for "Hal" a lone than " Hamzaa". 13. "Saebawea" and "Iben Jenny" referred to the reason of decision to lay on intronegative "Hamzaa" and not "Hal". This is opposite to what small number of grammchials saw which believe that "Hal" can be used for decision. 14. Some constricted intronegative which reversed to equalization by some words such as "Sawaa" " La ubali" or "Ma ubali" and some added "La Adri" or "MA Adri" and "Lait shaire", but it seems to me that there is no way to restrict the meaning on equalization by these. If the speech referred to equalization with any words of these it will be the case. 15. Finally the subject of "Inauguration and Emphasis in Arabic language" is a wide subject and grammchials and talk a tires had searched it long and if I talked long about it I said, I took small from large and if I am true. I am proud of God.

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.