ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







استراتيجية طرفى الحرب على غزة بعد التهدئة

المصدر: مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية
الناشر: مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط
المؤلف الرئيسي: نعيرات، رائد (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Nueirat, Raed
المجلد/العدد: مج18, ع69
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الأردن
التاريخ الميلادي: 2014
الشهر: خريف
الصفحات: 15 - 30
DOI: 10.12816/0008464
ISSN: 1811-8208
رقم MD: 588506
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: HumanIndex, EcoLink
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

15

حفظ في:
LEADER 02853nam a22002537a 4500
001 0228412
024 |3 10.12816/0008464 
041 |a ara 
044 |b الأردن 
100 |a نعيرات، رائد  |g Nueirat, Raed  |e مؤلف  |9 326544 
245 |a استراتيجية طرفى الحرب على غزة بعد التهدئة  
260 |b مركز دراسات الشرق الاوسط  |c 2014  |g خريف 
300 |a 15 - 30 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b The study of the balance of power between the conflict parties after approving the quiet is basically aimed at recognizing the nature, size and approaches of the general shifts arising in Hamas and Israel. The paper focuses on two main subjects. The first is the context of both parties at the beginning of the war and the later local, regional (Arab) and international shifts. The second relates to the targets of the Israel aggression, such as disarming the resistance, isolating it from its social support and building an open Arab alliance against it, in particular, and the Gaza Strip, in general. The study concludes that there are two types of variables in this regard. One of them is associated with strategic shifts, which could be employed to introduce major changes in the tracks and approaches of the Arab-Israeli conflict in the long run. These often have to do with the political culture of a broad segment of the Palestinian people and the Arab milieu. The other type is related to momentary tactical and material shifts, represented by Israel’s inability to accomplish its goals. On the one hand, it could not disarm the resistance or even set the subject on the negotiation table. In addition, a counter-alliance was stronger than the Arab alliance which it could not form. On the other hand, Hamas and the Gaza Strip achieved much more than Israel did at international official and public levels. Furthermore, the war was a major lever for national unity and reconciliation. In conclusion, there are a number of future policies which need to be employed to guide the changes in a way that sustains the Palestinian rights. In other words, the national, Arab, regional and international accomplishments need to be efficiently invested. 
653 |a المتغيرات التى أحدثها العدوان الإسرائيلى على غزة  
653 |a الصراع العربى الإسرائيلى  
653 |a الوضع الإستراتيجى لطرفى الصراع بعد الحرب  
773 |4 العلوم السياسية  |6 Political Science  |c 002  |e Middle East Studies Journal  |f Maǧallaẗ dirāsāt šarq awsaṭiyyaẗ  |l 069  |m مج18, ع69  |o 0836  |s مجلة دراسات شرق أوسطية  |v 018  |x 1811-8208 
856 |u 0836-018-069-002.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q y 
995 |a HumanIndex 
995 |a EcoLink 
999 |c 588506  |d 588506