| LEADER |
07462nam a22003377a 4500 |
| 001 |
0013213 |
| 041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
| 100 |
|
|
|9 107712
|a الدوري، أنمار عبدالجبار جاسم
|e مؤلف
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a سياسة روسيا تجاه الدولة العثمانية 1828 - 1841 م
|
| 246 |
|
|
|a The Russian – Ottoman Relations (1828 – 1841)
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a تكريت
|c 2009
|m 1430
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 - 240
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a رسائل جامعية
|
| 502 |
|
|
|b رسالة ماجستير
|c جامعة تكريت
|f كلية التربية
|g العراق
|o 0662
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The Ottoman – Russian struggle a long period between these two states . It represented along its wide range a practical reality which embodied the idealogical contrast between them . The first one set out in its struggle from its belonging to Islam where the second was struggling according to the suggestion of the hostile camp . The Ottomans moved the jihad element in their expanding toward the east , west , and south and this was the motivation of the invasions and conquests which the conquest of Constantinople in may 1453 A.D represented the last turning point . when the Ottoman proceeding stopped at the walls of Vienna by the leadership of the sultan Suleiman AL- Qanoni (1520 -1566 ) and this malfer was recurrent many times until the Ottomans reached the sharp contrary turning point by their first stoppage against the armies of Tzar Peter The Great ( 1682-1725 ) then Tzar Katherine II ( 1762-1796 ) and the signature of Contract of peace ( Kujuk Kenarma ) in 1774 on the background of war which lasted from 1768 till 1774 . This is one aspect ; the other one which is related to the moirés behind the Russian intents Which Were in reality held an expanding Colonialist mark moved by the concealed host limes in order to restore (Constantinople) from the ottomans since there was a great doctrinal relationship between it and the Russians. The period from 1828-1841 witnessed the Russian – Ottoman war which came on the back ground of the Greek revolution which shed light on the European area . The end of war which Russia had won in 1829 was the start of change of the polities of Russia towards the Ottoman state as the committee which was held by the Russian Tzar Nicolas I concluded-which started its work after the signature of the Adrena treaty in 1829 – than it was necessary to protect the Ottoman state entity because the committee believed that disintegration would cause problems to Russia in its Southern Territories . The period from 1832 to 1841 witnessed a mutual approach between Russia and the Ottoman state , especially in the Ottoman – Egyptian dispute and that rapprochment prodnced the defensive treaty known as the treaty of Hunkar Askalacy which lasted until 1841 . Britain and France Considered Hunkar Askalacy real danger which threatened their interests , the British foreign minister Palmeriston saw that the treaty made Russia the only controller in the straits while Austeria was anxious about the results of the treaty and it was not less than the feeling of Britain and France . The attitueles of the European states toward Muhammad Ali were inconsistent , especially the Frenech attitude which sustained the attitude of Muhammad Ali the Egyptian governer and supported it m contrary with the rest of the European stats which stood against it . The thesis consists of introduction four chapters , and conclusion ; each chapter consist of many subchapters : The first chapter is the introduction which displays the Russian – Ottoman relationships 1762-1827 A.D. The chapter gives a general depiction about the beginning of the relayixnship between these two states and its development especially during the reign of Tsar Katherine II, AD (1762- 1792 ) and the Tsar Alexander I ( 1801-1825 ) and that period witnessed about the conflict between the two states . It witnessed also the eruption of some revolutions against the Ottoman authority in Serbia 1804,and in Greece 1821.
|a The second chapter is devoted to study the relationship between the two states since the Russian – Ottoman war in 1828 until 1832 . That period witnessed the Russian - Ottoman war 1828 – 1828 and Aderna treaty 1829 . It include the attitnde of the great forces from the independence of Greece and the Egyptian Campaign against AL- Sham ( Syrian ) Country , and its in flounce on Russian – Ottoman relationships . It witnessed the occurrence of rapprochement between them as the result of a committee decision which was held by the Russian Tsar Nicolas I whose results where unexpected as concluded to the necessity of keeping the Ottoman state . The third chapter tackles the strategic change in the Russian – Ottoman relationships which represents as an extension to the long coflict between these two states , and Russian attitude towards the invasion of Mohammad Ali to AL-Sham country ( Syria ) and Cottahia peace treaty in 1833 , that peace which did not end the dispute between the Sultan and his follower Muhammad Ali pasha , and the effect of Russian – Ottoman rapproachment was the holding of the de peusiue treaty between them which was called Hunkar Askalacy treaty in 1833 . The fourth chapter treats unith the development of the Russian – Ottoman relationship 1834-1841 , one of them is the attitude of the Europen states from the authority of Muhammad Ali Pasha in Al-Sham Country for the period 1834 -1838 , which was considered as a part of the suggestions of the Russian attitude which surported the Ottoman stat at that period . It treats also with the succeed of Britain to hold the commercial treaty of Balta Liman in 1838 which was considered as a great gain to the Ottoman state which had last the war with Muhammad Ali pasha . The chapter also tackles the Egyptian – Ottoman second war in 1839 , and the Russian attitude towards that war in addition to solve the crisis between the Ottoman sultan and his follower militarily according to the treaty of London in July 1840 , and the solving of the problem of the traits according to London treaty for traits in 1841 which was attached to the treaty itself . In writing this thesis a fundamental group of Arabic, translated and foreign resources are used Which enrich the thesis in all of its parts with important, precise and scientific information Which help to ripening this fruit that I wish to take its place in our Libraries.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a التاريخ الإسلامي
|a روسيا
|a الدولة العثمانية
|a السياسة الخارجية
|a العلاقات الدبلوماسية
|
| 700 |
|
|
|a الدوري، سامي صالح محمد صياد
|g Al-Sayyad, Sami Saleh Mohammed
|e مشرف
|9 107742
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-T.pdf
|y صفحة العنوان
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-A.pdf
|y المستخلص
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-C.pdf
|y قائمة المحتويات
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-F.pdf
|y 24 صفحة الأولى
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-0.pdf
|y الفصل التمهيدي
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-1.pdf
|y 1 الفصل
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-2.pdf
|y 2 الفصل
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-3.pdf
|y 3 الفصل
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-4.pdf
|y 4 الفصل
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-O.pdf
|y الخاتمة
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 9805-009-014-0662-R.pdf
|y المصادر والمراجع
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d n
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a Dissertations
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 597526
|d 597526
|
