المصدر: | أعمال المؤتمر الدولي الثاني: الخطاب الموسيقي وسؤال الهوية |
---|---|
الناشر: | المعهد العالي للموسيقى بصفاقس و كلية الآداب والعلوم الانسانية بصفاقس |
المؤلف الرئيسي: | Smaoui, Chokri (Author) |
محكمة: | نعم |
الدولة: |
تونس |
التاريخ الميلادي: |
2014
|
مكان انعقاد المؤتمر: | صفاقس |
رقم المؤتمر: | 2 |
الهيئة المسؤولة: | المعهد العالي للموسيقى وكلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية |
الصفحات: | 115 - 148 |
رقم MD: | 624046 |
نوع المحتوى: | بحوث المؤتمرات |
اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
قواعد المعلومات: | HumanIndex |
مواضيع: | |
رابط المحتوى: |
الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها. |
المستخلص: |
This study attempts to compare the way native and non-native examiners score Tunisian learners' speaking performance holistic ally and analytically based on a quantitative approach. The major objective is to examine the effect of the raters' backgrounds on their scoring behaviors of non-native English speaking learners by calculating their degree of reliability, consistency and bias in their assigned marks. Thus, six oral performances were recorded and given to four native and four non-native raters who assessed and scored them based on both holistic and analytic rating scales. The examiners' gradings were compared according to five major parameters, namely the mean, the standard deviation, the coefficients of variation, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. Native and non-native rater groups differed slightly in assigning scores and in interpreting the results of their test takers in the four rating criteria, namely fluency, vocabulary, pronunciation and grammar. Despite some significant differences in marks and comments provided by both native and non-native rater groups, it was clear that both groups were reliable and consistent in their judgments of the test takers’ oral responses to three oral tasks: describing and contrasting two pictures, telling a story and conducting an interview. |
---|