From the Psychological to the Temporl : A Comparative Study Between Harold Pinter's landscape and George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-FOUR
| المصدر: | مجلة كلية التربية - القسم الأدبي |
|---|---|
| الناشر: | جامعة عين شمس - كلية التربية |
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | Serry, Shahira (Author) |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج11, ع3 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: |
مصر |
| التاريخ الميلادي: |
2005
|
| الصفحات: | 1 - 32 |
| رقم MD: | 664237 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| قواعد المعلومات: | EduSearch, AraBase |
| مواضيع: | |
| رابط المحتوى: |
عدد مرات التحميل
22
| المستخلص: |
In Landscape (1968) Pinter escapes the limits of the room comedies, and shifts from physical places and situations to the infinite ample potentialities of a different dramatic form, particularly, the temporal form. Such a temporal form is typically exemplified by George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949). Both Orwell in Nineteen Eighty-Four and Pinter in Landscape are similarly interested in the temporal technique in writing. But while Orwell is concerned in his temporal technique with the shape of the future in relation to man; Pinter, unlike Orwell, uses the temporal technique to throw light on the past time of his characters. While Orwell, on the one hand, presents social predictions about man’s modem human technological predicament; Pinter, on the other hand, compared to Orwell, presents competitive poetic recollections or remembrances of the characters’ past time. Whereas, it is Orwell’s human concern with man’s future, on the one hand, that prompts him to try to free man’s individuality from the menace of futuristic tyrannical totalitarian abuses of technology; it is Pinter’s artistic concern, compared to Orwell’s, on the other hand, but rather with the question of time, and memory, which motivates Pinter, to attempt to free man’s consciousness from the haunting menace and obsessing burden of the ever-existing past as absorbing, and conditioning the present time. According to Pinter, things that are actually happening are not only of the greatest importance, but have the most crucial bearing on man’s life. Orwell and Pinter are similarly concerned with man’s psychological predicament. But while Orwell’s temporal technique focuses on the futuristic human predicament of man; Pinter’s obsession with the present emotional marital predicament of man, urges him to use in Landscape the temporal technique to present, unlike Orwell, an exploration of memory, time, the past, all are conveyed in a series 01 emotive poetic reminiscences. |
|---|---|
| وصف العنصر: |
النص باللغة الإنجليزية |
عناصر مشابهة
-
Revisiting Harold Pinter’s The Caretaker: A Semiotic Study Of The Dramatis Personae
بواسطة: بسباس، خالد محمد منشور: (2019) -
The theme of Possessors and Dispossessors in Harold Pinter’s Plays
بواسطة: Farid, Karma Mohamed Sami منشور: (1990) -
Politics in the Plays of Harold Pinter
بواسطة: Abd Ullah, Ikhlas Sabah منشور: (2012) -
The Fate of Individualism in Ayn Rand's Anthem and George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four
بواسطة: Al Qudah, Ahmad Mohammad منشور: (2013) -
Outsiders and the Impact of the Aggressive Forces on Them in Selected Plays of Harold Pinter
بواسطة: Al Maaroof, Ansam Riyadh Abd Allah منشور: (2003)
