ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > Translating Legal and Administ...>مارك

Translating Legal and Administrative Language : How to Deal With Legal Terms and Their Flexible Meaning Potential

المصدر: مجلة ترجمان
الناشر: جامعة عبدالمالك السعدى - مدرسة الملك فهد العليا للترجمة
المؤلف الرئيسي: Heylen, Kris (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Steurs, Frieda (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج23, ع2
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: المغرب
التاريخ الميلادي: 2014
الشهر: أكتوبر
الصفحات: 96 - 146
ISSN: 1113-1292
رقم MD: 781086
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
الترجمة | القانون الإداري | المصطلحات القانونية | اللغة المقارنة
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)     
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

32

حفظ في:
LEADER 02931nam a22002057a 4500
001 0160972
044 |b المغرب 
100 |9 412974  |a Heylen, Kris  |e Author 
245 |a Translating Legal and Administrative Language :   |b How to Deal With Legal Terms and Their Flexible Meaning Potential 
260 |b جامعة عبدالمالك السعدى - مدرسة الملك فهد العليا للترجمة  |c 2014  |g أكتوبر 
300 |a 96 - 146 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات 
520 |b Compared to other Languages for Specific Purposes (LSPs), the terminology of the legal domain poses a number of specific challenges to translation. Firstly, most legal terms refer to abstract concepts and are not defined through referential properties (contrary to e.g. machine parts in a technical domain), but rather intentionally, using other abstract concepts. Secondly, because the law deals with all aspects of everyday life, legal terminology shows a considerable overlap with Language for General Purposes (LGP). Thirdly, thelegal jargon often uses a number near-synonyms (e.g. violation, breach, infringement or null and void) for the same concept (Gozdz-Roszkowski 2013). These properties, potentially cause semantic vagueness and necessitate that an onomasiological approach to legal terminology (first defining a concept and then listing the terms) be supplemented with a semasiological approach that investigates how near-synonymous terms and terms shared with LGP realize their flexible meaning potential in specific contexts. In a translation setting, this problem of semantic instability is further aggravated because the terms’ contextual nuances do not only have to be adequately rendered in other language but the terms’ translational equivalents also have their own ambiguity in a different legal system, whose concepts might be similar but often not completely equivalent. In this paper, we look at a case study of the translation of the Statutory Regulations of the University of Leuven(OrganiekReglement KU Leuven) from Dutch and the Belgian-Flemish legal system into English with different legal systems present in the background (UK Law, American Law, European Law). First we select a sample of terms in the source text that have multiple translation in the target text. We then analyse whether these term show ambiguity in the source text through a corpus-based analysis. Finally, we analyse if and how this ambiguityled to multiple translations in the English target. 
653 |a الترجمة  |a القانون الإداري  |a المصطلحات القانونية  |a اللغة المقارنة 
700 |9 412975  |a Steurs, Frieda  |e Co-Author 
773 |4 اللغة واللغويات  |6 Language & Linguistics  |c 005  |f Turjumān  |l 002  |m مج23, ع2  |o 1345  |s مجلة ترجمان  |t Turjuman Magazine  |v 023  |x 1113-1292 
856 |u 1345-023-002-005.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y 
995 |a AraBase 
999 |c 781086  |d 781086 

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.