ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







A Comparison Study of Two Types of All Ceramic Restorations Fracture Loads Involved in the Framework of Removable Partial Dentures

المؤلف الرئيسي: Al Suwaihib, Bander (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Moorehead, Robert (Advisor), Patrick, David (Advisor), Wood, Duncan (Advisor)
التاريخ الميلادي: 2016
موقع: شفيلد
الصفحات: 1 - 44
رقم MD: 783543
نوع المحتوى: رسائل جامعية
اللغة: الإنجليزية
الدرجة العلمية: رسالة ماجستير
الجامعة: University of Sheffield
الكلية: School of Clinical Dentistry
الدولة: بريطانيا
قواعد المعلومات: Dissertations
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

32

حفظ في:
المستخلص: Aim: To investigate the fracture strength of two types of all ceramic restorations involved in the framework of removable partial dentures. Materials and Methods: Two types of all ceramic restorations were used to fabricate the crowns: Zirconia ceramics materials (SpectraHT, Germany) and IPS e.max Press ceramics materials (Ivoclar Vivadent, Austria). For the framework of removable partial denture, cobalt- chrome alloys (Wironit, BEGO, Germany) were used. And (Rhino Rock DB, UK) model resin materials were selected to fabricate the models. All crowns were subjected to the Universal Testing Machine (Admet, Lloyd LRX, UK) to investigate the fracture strength of both types of all ceramic crowns. Results: After the fracture load was applied: (1) No fractures were observed to all ceramic crowns that have been used as an abutment to the framework of removable partial denture (saddle). (2) A deformation occurred to the partial denture frameworks (saddle) that involved with all ceramic restorations. (3) By comparing the means of the tensile strength of the RPD framework and all ceramic restorations and by using the One- way ANOVA to analyse the data, the results were significant (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: With the limitation of this study, Zirconia and IPS e.max Press ceramic restorations can support the framework of RPD.