| المستخلص: |
وتتضمن أهم النتائج التي توصل إليها الباحث، وهي كالتالي: أنه ليس كل ما يعلم مما هو حق يطلب نشره وإن كان من علم الشريعة ومما يفيد علما بالأحكام، بل قد تقتضي المصلحة الإمساك أحيانا، وكتب العلماء والفقهاء، وفتاويهم متضمنة لهذا المعنى. أن المفتي قد لا يتقيد بحكم شرعي ثابت لا يقبل التغيير في بعض الحالات تبعا للأثر المترتب على ذلك، بل عليه أن يزن الأمور بميزان المصالح والمفاسد في ذلك، فقد يكون من المصلحة مخالفة ظاهر الحكم، ومن أبرز الأمثلة المعاصرة في ذلك: واقع كثير من الأقليات الإسلامية وما يحيط بهم من ظروف وملابسات، وما يستجد عندهم من مسائل ونوازل. إن من فقه المفتي وبعد نظره أن يفرق في فتاويه في بعض الحالات بين الفتوى العامة والفتوى الخاصة إذا لزم الأمر. أن على الجهات المسؤولة متابعة المفتين ولفت نظر المتلاعب بها، وفي حال عدم الامتثال يتم رفع دعوى قضائية ضده؛ ليتم إيقاع العقوبة التعزيرية المناسبة في حقه.
Praisebe to Allah through whose mercy (and favors) all good things are accomplished. At the end of this research I would like to mention the founding and recommendations: • Not every known truth could be spread, even though it is fromreligious science from what helps to understand ruling, it is better to conceal in some cases. And the books of scholars and their Fatwa feature this meaning. • A1 Mufti should not always hold on constant ruling for some incident, but he should evaluate the incident and consider the circumstances and reflect on the pros and cons, because it could be useful to evade the apparent meaning of the ruling. An example from the current time; the reality of many Muslim minorities and all circumstances regarding them their contemporary matters. Whoever reflects on Islamic legislation, he notice it consideration for adult’s customs and habits, according to the Islamic precepts, and based on achieving ultimate advantages, which are determined by Islamic scholars, and not left for everyone to state his judgment. • Scholars have some disagreement whether “al Mufti” is required to grantee his fatwa or no. However, they are likely to say: if “al Mufti” is illegible for Fatwa, then he should not grantee his Fatwa. And if he is not illegible, then he will be responsible for the consequences of his mistaken Fatwa. But if the questioner notices that “al Mufti” is not illegible because of some clues like his appearance or logic, then “al Mufti” will not be responsible, but he could be blamed for his audacity. • Most scholars believe that one of the main duties of the legal authorities is to band those who are not qualified or not known from issuing Fatwa.
|
