ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Colonial Sudan: The Separate Administration of the South (1920-1933)

المصدر: مجلة الترجمة واللغات
الناشر: جامعة وهران 2 محمد بن أحمد - مختبر الترجمة والمنهجية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Dani, Fatiha (Author)
المجلد/العدد: ع15
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الجزائر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2016
الصفحات: 439 - 450
ISSN: 1112-3974
رقم MD: 839961
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Southern Policy | Nationalists | Britain | Disunity
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
LEADER 02474nam a22002177a 4500
001 1596163
041 |a eng 
044 |b الجزائر 
100 |9 451436  |a Dani, Fatiha  |e Author 
245 |a Colonial Sudan:  |b The Separate Administration of the South (1920-1933) 
260 |b جامعة وهران 2 محمد بن أحمد - مختبر الترجمة والمنهجية  |c 2016 
300 |a 439 - 450 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b As a matter of fact, many educated Sudanese questioned whether there ever existed a coherent and comprehensive British policy toward the Sudan as a whole and toward its Southern Regions in particular. There was actually no room in Sudanese nationalism for continuing domination of the traditional leaders, and as Native Administration came under increasing attacks by the nationalists, so too did its resultant “Southern Policy”, with all its implications for separatism. Ten years after its promulgation, the Southern Policy was regarded by the nationalists as the very symbol of the British imperial dictum of Divide and Rule, intended to continue British control in the Sudan by perpetuating the separation of the country into two regions. Sudanese nationalists viewed the Southern Policy as part of a system which sought to search for the past not to look for the future, and to emphasize diversity not to encourage unity. Moreover, the language policy adopted in the South did not aim specifically at the exclusion of Islam and Arabic but more at the encouragement of English as a lingua franca. This created or intensified linguistic division, which still complicates North – South relations today. Sudanese nationalists continued to condemn the Southern Policy because its implementation, they considered , allowed the ultimate political arrangements of a unified Sudan to be indefinitely postponed .This section is reserved to the birth and execution of the Southern Policy, the factor most responsible for the Sudan’s present separation. 
653 |a السياسة الجنوبية  |a القوميون  |a بريطانيا العظمى  |a بريطانيا 
692 |b Southern Policy  |b Nationalists  |b Britain  |b Disunity 
773 |4 الادب  |4 علم اللغة  |6 Literature  |6 Linguistics  |c 041  |l 015  |m ع15  |o 1725  |s مجلة الترجمة واللغات  |t Journal of Translation and Languages  |v 000  |x 1112-3974 
856 |u 1725-000-015-041.pdf 
930 |d n  |p y  |q n 
995 |a AraBase 
999 |c 839961  |d 839961 

عناصر مشابهة