| المستخلص: |
يهدف هذا البحث إلى دراسة رقابة القضاء الإداري على الجزاءات الإدارية التي يحق للسلطات الإدارية المختصة اتخاذها (الوالي، وزير البيئة...) في مواجهة المنشآت المصنفة المخالفة (الخطرة، والمقلقة للراحة، والضارة بالصحة)، وخلصت الدراسة إلى ضرورة مراعاة بعض الإجراءات قبل توقيع الجزاء، وأهمها توجيه لإخطار إلى مستغل المنشأة لتصحيح الوضع المخالف، وأن يتضمن الإخطار مدة محددة وأن يكون مسببا وأن رقابة القضاء الإداري لا تكون فقط على شرعية هذه الجزاءات فحسب، وإنما تمتد إلى مدى ملاءمتها مع التصرف المخالف. حيث تخضع الجزاءات والعقوبات.
This research aims to study the control of the administrative judiciary to administrative sanctions entitled administrative authorities competent to take (the governor, the Minister of Environment ...) in the face of classified violation facilities (dangerous, and Oualemqlqh to rest, and harmful to health), and the study concluded that the need to take into account some of the measures before signing Aldza, the most important guide for the notification to the operator of the facility Tsahihh offending situation, Wa, notification shall contain a specified period and the fact that the cause and control of the administrative court is not only the legitimacy of these sanctions, but extends to their suitability with the offending act. Where sanctions and administrative sanctions, signed by the competent administrative authorities under (Minister of the Environment or the governor) on classified installations Taatkhalv legislation regulating them, and, in particular, rationing Albih or contrary to the conditions or instructions to be followed to control the administrative judiciary, saw a, the legitimacy of such sanctions must be respected number from the previous procedural guarantees to take sanctions. What is the role of the administrative judiciary in protecting the environment, through the control of the administrative sanctions within the scope of Origin classified harmful to the environment?
|
