ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







نقد المنظور الاستشراقي للجهاد: مايكل بونر أنموذجاً

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Critique of the Orientalist Perspective of Jihad: Michael Bonner as a Model
المصدر: مجلة دراسات استشراقية
الناشر: العتبة العباسية المقدسة - المركز الاسلامي للدراسات الاستراتيجية
المؤلف الرئيسي: عبدالمجيد، غيضان السيد علي (مؤلف)
المؤلف الرئيسي (الإنجليزية): Ali, Ghidhan Assayed
المجلد/العدد: ع20
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2019
التاريخ الهجري: 1441
الشهر: خريف
الصفحات: 136 - 156
DOI: 10.35518/1401-000-020-005
ISSN: 2409-1928
رقم MD: 1053046
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo, HumanIndex
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

14

حفظ في:
المستخلص: The Orientalist Critique of Jihad as presented by Michael Bonner is a research that opens an in-depth discussion of the concept of jihad from an Islamic perspective, and what the orientalist Bonner and his peers wanted of marketing, makes jihad in Islam equal to the spread of Islam by the sword. In fact, the problems of the orientalist, to which Dr. Ghidan Al Sayed Ali responded, sometimes with statements of faith, need further consideration of their backgrounds. Actually, the publishing of Bonners book widely in French in 2003 and later in English in 2006 has had promotional obvious objectives establishing for a correlation between Islam, the sword and terrorism, which would complement the intelligence effort in establishing terrorist organizations in cooperation and coordination with the Takfiri Salafism (the antiblasphemy fundamentalist radicals). This is in terms of media and political employment of the battle against Islam as a whole, and against the concept of “jihad” (the strife for religious missionary purposes) in Islam in particular. The Orientalist mentions some demands as if they were postulates, leaning on them to suspect the Holy Quran and the Hadith in order to evade the authority of the sacred religious text, and to mold the Islamic interpretation of jihad so it may grow subject to the practices of the unjust sultans in the Islamic history. What is required is to undermine the foundations and backgrounds that expose those researches for their academic dimension and shed light on their political employment on the one hand, and detail the ethics of fighting among Muslims, on the other hand, so that he may separate terrorism from the Islamic concept of “jihad”. In our heritage, we also have critical readings of the idea of conquests that need someone to highlight them.

ISSN: 2409-1928