| LEADER |
03692nam a22002297a 4500 |
| 001 |
1857924 |
| 024 |
|
|
|3 10.21608/JSSA.2021.50854.1214
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b مصر
|
| 100 |
|
|
|9 599806
|a El Shazly, Reham Farouk
|e Author
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a The Pandemic Lockdown Discourse Space:
|b A Critical Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis: Threat Construction Rhetoric within the Framework of Proximization
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b جامعة عين شمس - كلية البنات للآداب والعلوم والتربية
|c 2020
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 290 - 330
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b Recently, a new coronavirus disease COVID-19 has emerged as a respiratory infection with significant concern for global public health hazards. WHO has been alarmed with the growing curve of confirmed cases and death tolls that have been globally reported. During this pandemic, ‘social distancing’ and lockdown were encouraged to flatten the curve which has had major social, political, and economic consequences. Drawing on data from PM Boris Johnson’s and President Donald Trump’s public speeches after WHO’s declaration of the global pandemic state, the current study aimed to explore the conceptual and spatial representation of lockdown during the outbreak of COVID-19 in the UK and U.S. from a cognitive perspective. Based on a spatial-temporal and axiological model, this study examined the discursive strategies used by the UK and U.S. governments to legitimize the countries’ full or partial lockdown in March 2020. Applying Cap’s Proximization Theory (2006, 2008, 2013a), a cognitive-pragmatic model of threat construction, this study investigated how these administrations constructed threat by deploying construal of relations between entities within the Discourse Space (DS). The findings revealed how the DS between the conceptualizers’ deictic centre and the threat was curtailed or broadened using conceptual, lexico-grammatical, and coercive strategies. The results showed that PM Johnson relied heavily on a dynamic discursive representation of threat; whereas, President Trump represented the Chinese threat statically. The former appealed to conceptualizers’ fear by broadening the distance between the threat and conceptualizers using promising proximization; whereas, the latter downplayed the virus’ risk blaming it on others, positioning adversary state(s) as a source of threat in mental space. Both leaders emphasized the conceptualization of the shift of ‘Us’ moving towards ‘Them’ to neutralize it in a counter-threat plan enactment. The analysis relayed how the represented mental patterns could be mapped to their discursive and linguistic representations. This research has implications for better understanding world leaders’ forced construal of health threat as a tool of public’s manipulation and coercion to legitimize policies by reconstructing the conceptualizers’ mental spaces. Further, it adds to our knowledge on how crises can impact forms of sociality in DS, rearranging distance as a performative act to make care and endearment.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a جائحة كورونا
|a التوعية الصحية
|a البراغماتية
|
| 692 |
|
|
|b Proximization Theory
|b Critical Cognitive Pragmatics
|b Spatial Cognition
|b STA Model
|b Health Discourse
|b Public Space Discourses
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 الادب
|6 Literature
|c 012
|e Academic Research Journal for Arts
|f Mağallaẗ Al-Baḥṯ Al-ʿilmī Fī Al-Ādāb
|l 009
|m ع21, ج9
|o 0795
|s مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب
|v 021
|x 2356-8321
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 0795-021-009-012.pdf
|n https://jssa.journals.ekb.eg/article_146726.html
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q y
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a AraBase
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 1116042
|d 1116042
|
