ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > أقوال المفسرين بين الرواية وال...>الوصف

أقوال المفسرين بين الرواية والاجتهاد: دراسة وتحليل

العنوان المترجم: The Sayings of The Interpreters Between the Narration and The Ijtihad: Study and Analysis
المصدر: مجلة بحوث كلية الآداب
الناشر: جامعة المنوفية - كلية الآداب
المؤلف الرئيسي: الساعدي، نضال حنش شبار حبيب (مؤلف)
المجلد/العدد: ج113
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2018
الشهر: أبريل
الصفحات: 1785 - 1814
DOI: 10.21608/SJAM.2018.144265
ISSN: 2090-2956
رقم MD: 1134620
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: العربية
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
القرآن الكريم | التفسيرات القرآنية | الروايات الدينية | الصحابة والتابعين | علم الأصول
رابط المحتوى:

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, for whom there is merit and guidance from before and after, and the best prayer, and completed the handover to Abu al-Qasim Muhammad (may Allah bless him and his family) But after It is time to conclude with the study of the concepts and terms of study followed by the view of the scholars of interpretation of the terms (the adage and the opinion); the second was the problematic issue of the novel between the two schools In the interpretation and two areas dealt with the researcher through them, the statement of the companion and the correlation between acceptance and response, in addition to their argument in the interpretation of mental and linguistic, as well as the authoritative one news, and then concluded the study of the most important results, which we can summarize the following: It is similar to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) when the Sunnah, while Al-Alamiyyah represents the references of the religion of Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them). The expression of the tabai is the third source of interpretation and is taken from the heads of the followers at the Sunnah, while the front, they represent the messengers of the words, which are cut free of the fundamentals, such as Akrama, Mujahid, and tender. It also depends on the words of the tabai when the modern schools of interpretation in the case of free of opinion، And the difference between the scholars of Imamiyah in the authoritative news of the one; where the Sheikh Sheikh Mufid Sheikh Al-Sadouk refer to the news of the one and inferred by the absolute without verifying his health. It is clear that the objection of Imamiyah to the news of the one is due to the absolute non-introduction, such as Mr. Khoei and Tabatabai mark, and the last non-launch; but acceptance of the condition of his health as useful Sheikh؛ The story of one is a mental biography of some Shiite scholars such as Sheikh knowledge; do not worship on the news of one. It also represents the science of the most important elements of the interpretation of the judgment of some interpreters forward like the wise; it is the source of arguments. With the consensus of some of the interpreters of the Imamate and the isolated in the provision of the rule of reason on the rule of Sharia. It is clear to us that the problem of the rejectionists of categorical science is their adoption of legislative evidence; they have no importance for consensus and reason. It also represents the mental evidence in terms of priority and the last evidence at the imamate and specifically the fundamentalists; while the measurement comes and followed by consensus after the Book and Sunnah at the public. It is clear to us that the contradiction between the mental evidence and the hearing with the newsmen prompts them to submit the first to the second with the interpretation of the latter in relation to what is attributed to it; otherwise, they will present it altogether, unlike the fundamentalists who do not support the existence of this contradiction. The linguistic source of some of the interpreters of the Imamah Kaltusi source is based on the suspicion of uncertainty, which is contrary to Ibn Khaldun to refer to him if we miss the evidence of transport and mental; it is the language of the Koran is OK to refer to it. The study also found that the meeting and the difference of opinion does not mean striking or distorting the Qur'anic meaning; rather, it is in the source of these transport, mental and jurisprudential origins in terms of priority and lack thereof in the statement of the meaning of the Quranic text with us or.
ISSN: 2090-2956

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.