ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







The Effect of Using Repeated Reading Strategy on Students Faulty Pronunciation

المصدر: مجلة آداب الفراهيدي
الناشر: جامعة تكريت - كلية الآداب
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ismai, Ramziya Khalil (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج13, ع46
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2021
الشهر: حزيران
الصفحات: 440 - 448
DOI: 10.51990/2228-013-046-075
ISSN: 2074-9554
رقم MD: 1175948
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Reading Strategy | Repeated Reading | Pronunciation | Error Rating | Wrong Pronunciation
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
LEADER 02339nam a22002297a 4500
001 1920573
024 |3 10.51990/2228-013-046-075 
041 |a eng 
044 |b العراق 
100 |9 630124  |a Ismai, Ramziya Khalil  |e Author 
245 |a The Effect of Using Repeated Reading Strategy on Students Faulty Pronunciation 
260 |b جامعة تكريت - كلية الآداب  |c 2021  |g حزيران 
300 |a 440 - 448 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b The present study aims to explore whether repeated reading strategy can help students improve their pronunciation or not. It also tries to find out and analyze different types of pronunciation errors that may be made by students in relation to segmental features. The pronunciation errors are classified into four categories: selection, ordering, omission and addition. The sample of the study consists of 38 students divided into an experimental and a control group. The experimental group received the treatment in the form of repeated reading strategy while the control group was taught by the traditional method. An experiment of 12 weeks has been conducted to fulfil the purposes of the study and to verify its two null hypotheses. Using the formulas of chi-square and t-test for two independent samples, it is found out that there are statistically significant differences between the two groups in the reading posttest in the favour of the experimental group. The findings support the effectiveness of using repeated reading strategy for improving students' pronunciation. The finding also shows that the highest percentage of errors is of selection which is 45% while the lowest percentage of errors is of ordering which is 2%. These are followed by errors of omission 28% and addition 25%. 
653 |a العملية التعليمية  |a الأساليب التدريسية  |a الاستراتيجيات القرائية  |a الأخطاء الإملائية 
692 |b Reading Strategy  |b Repeated Reading  |b Pronunciation  |b Error Rating  |b Wrong Pronunciation 
773 |4 علم اللغة  |6 Linguistics  |c 075  |e Journal of Al-Farahidi Arts  |f Mağallaẗ ādāb Al-Farāhīdī  |l 046  |m مج13, ع46  |o 2228  |s مجلة آداب الفراهيدي  |v 013  |x 2074-9554 
856 |u 2228-013-046-075.pdf 
930 |d n  |p y  |q n 
995 |a AraBase 
999 |c 1175948  |d 1175948