ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Emotional Fallacies in Public Discourse: A Proposed Perspective for Research

المصدر: مجلة جامعة مصر للدراسات الإنسانية
الناشر: جامعة مصر للعلوم والتكنولوجيا
المؤلف الرئيسي: Al-Hadi, Taher Mohammad (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج1, ع4
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2021
الشهر: يوليو
الصفحات: 187 - 207
ISSN: 2735-5861
رقم MD: 1190271
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase, HumanIndex
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Public Discourse | Logical Fallacies | Emotional Fallacies | Arguments
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

11

حفظ في:
LEADER 02327nam a22002297a 4500
001 1935721
041 |a eng 
044 |b مصر 
100 |a Al-Hadi, Taher Mohammad  |e Author  |9 343457 
245 |a Emotional Fallacies in Public Discourse:  |b A Proposed Perspective for Research 
260 |b جامعة مصر للعلوم والتكنولوجيا  |c 2021  |g يوليو 
300 |a 187 - 207 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b It is widely believed that “emotion leads to action while reason leads to conclusions”, emotionalists can, then, consume others and be consumed by others to take action and reach specific conclusions (even if they were unsound). Pathos - for example - as a communication technique is used for persuading the public to have belief in a certain idea or take a specific action by appealing to their prejudices and by repeating and intensifying the words and phrases that can trigger their emotions towards that idea or that action. Such a technique may lead to get the public confused between what is and what should be. This is what is termed the fallacy of shoulds which targets influencing the public, positively or negatively, regardless appealing to logic or looking for the truth. Managing emotions is considered a big challenge particularly because fallacies, are intentionally committed in daily public discourse whoever its parties are, departing from emotions are powerful forces for influencing others. This is why the author believes that “emotional fallacies” is an issue that needs to be thoroughly and deeply explored. Therefore, this current paper tackles five main domains: public discourse, a quick view on logical fallacies, emotional fallacies overview, reasons behind emotional fallacies, and a proposed perspective for analyzing emotional fallacies. 
653 |a الخطاب العام  |a المغالطات العاطفية  |a المغالطات المنطقية 
692 |b Public Discourse  |b Logical Fallacies  |b Emotional Fallacies  |b Arguments 
773 |c 005  |f Maǧallaẗ Ǧāmiʿaẗ Miṣr Lil Dirāsāt Al-Insāniyyaẗ  |l 004  |m مج1, ع4  |o 2337  |s مجلة جامعة مصر للدراسات الإنسانية  |v 001  |x 2735-5861 
856 |u 2337-001-004-005.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a AraBase 
995 |a HumanIndex 
999 |c 1190271  |d 1190271