المستخلص: |
One of the basic principles that preserve the peace of international relations to this day is the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of states, whether politically or militarily, especially since the last act may amount to the designation of aggression in international law, which calls for the right of legitimate defense to be matched. Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations is the main reference in legitimizing the right of legitimate defense to repel aggression, but in many cases the right is matched by the abuse of the right, which is consistent with attempts to expand the interpretation of the aforementioned Article 51 in order to justify resorting to force outside the framework of the rules of international law. And put it under the conditioning of legitimate defense. Because of the frequent cases of resorting to force and intervention in what I see as contradicting international law, despite the protection of self-defense and Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, it is what prompted us to discuss this issue, to clarify the fact of using the right of legitimate defense in terms of the conditions for describing aggression that requires the right of defense, In addition to discussing the conditions for the defense itself, and the procedures required by international law, especially the Charter of the United Nations, and the text of Article 51 specifically.
|