| المستخلص: |
The core of the theory of hybridity has been emphasized throughout the merged relation between hybridity and diaspora categorizing the considerations and restrictions of social, cultural and political effects and transformations. Diaspora and hybridity have been one of the most arguable and integrated trends in universal debates. Diaspora presents the essence and the spirit of hybrid experiences and circumstances reflecting the wrestling divergent postcolonial cultural, social and political schemes. In fact, diaspora permits new social forms of cultural differences, which analyze the strategies of hybrid cultural articulations suggesting different reconfiguration between the dominant and subordinate cultures and concentrating on the diasporic immigrants who never fully equalized in any of the configurations of the host societies. The issue of diasporic identity becomes more complicated because it is extremely influenced by the practices, fears, concerns, expectations and frustrations of the diasporic immigrants. Diasporic life involves complex ambivalences which encounter with the integration of the immigrants in the host societies. In fact, diaspora generates the ‘in-between’ space or ‘borderline’ which makes a shift in the clarification of the colonial-postcolonial world order creating new identities and providing the minimum transparent assimilation of cross-cultural meanings including conditions, rituals and customs in the host societies. Thus, the diasporic cultural identity is the result of the mutual relation between postcolonial repercussions and hybridization deepening the perceptions of the relation between the process of hybridization itself and the ideological, political, social, cultural and economic challenges in postcolonial arena. Still, the central concern is to recognize how diasporic identities are converted, intertwined, interweaved to be hybrid, merged and conversant.
|
