ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > A Comparative and Correlationa...>الوصف

A Comparative and Correlational Study of Face-To-Face and Face-to-Screen EFL Students' Speaking Anxiety With Reference to Complex Dynamic: Systems Theory

المصدر: مجلة كلية التربية
الناشر: جامعة بنها - كلية التربية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Emara, Eman Abd Elhafeaz Mohamad (Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج33, ع132
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: مصر
التاريخ الميلادي: 2022
الشهر: أكتوبر
الصفحات: 59 - 90
DOI: 10.21608/JFEB.2022.301265
ISSN: 1110-2411
رقم MD: 1391546
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: EduSearch
مواضيع:
النظم الديناميكية | اللغة الإنجليزية | الأداء اللغوي
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Complex Dynamic Systems Theory | World Languages Anxiety Scale "OWLAS" | Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale "FLCAS" | English Language Speaking Anxiety
رابط المحتوى:
PDF (صورة)      PDF (نص)      HTML
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

4

حفظ في:
المستخلص: The present study sought to examine if there was a difference in students’ speaking skill (sub-skills) in the different learning environments of Face-to-Face versus Face-to-Screen based on foreign language anxiety levels in both environments. To investigate the interactions of the elements influencing students' anxiety, this study used the Complex Dynamic Systems Theory as a lens. The study participants were EFL seniors enrolled in the Faculty of Education at Damietta University. The participants were assigned to one group (N=30) in the academic year 2020/2021. Two scales were administered to the participants: the Online World Languages Anxiety Scale (OWLAS) face-to-screen (F2Screen) during the lockdown of COVID-19 and the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) Face-to-Face(F2F) after the lockdown ended. Three hypotheses were formulated. Pearson correlation coefficient and t-Test and a were used for statistical analysis. Results revealed that there is a statistically significant difference in anxiety scores as measured by the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale between two types of learning environments; F2F setting and Face-to-Screen setting, in favour of the F2F setting. Results also indicated that there was no correlation between the participants’ mean scores in the FLCAS and the total scores of the three sub-skills of speaking. Additionally, results indicates that there was no correlation between the participants’ mean scores in the OWLAS and the total of the three sub-skills of speaking.
ISSN: 1110-2411

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.