| المستخلص: |
هذا البحث يتجه تحديدا نحو إظهار مصادر كتاب "أسرار البلاغة/ المقدمة" للكاتب التركي إسماعيل حقي، من أمهات كتب البلاغة العربية، وإظهار أن أفكاره المتعلقة بمفاهيم البلاغة وتدوينها وأركانها، والتي كشفت عنها مقدمته إنما هي وليدة لأفكار عربية بحتة. فجاءت استشهاداته من مصادر التراث البلاغي، مكونا محوريا في أيدي المؤلف التركي يقوم بتحريكها وفقا لأغراضه ومقاصده، فعمل على توظيفها لتخدم أهدافه المتعددة، وكان غالبا ما يلجأ إليها لإثبات أفكاره وتقوية حجته في قضاياه البلاغية المطروحة، ومن ناحية أخرى، عملت تلك النصوص على تشكيل اتجاهاته في درسه البلاغي، ويعد الكشف عن ملامح هذا التشكيل أحد أهداف البحث الذي يسعى كذلك نحو الكشف عن كيفية تلقيه تلك المصادر، ومدى مقدرته على أن يدرس ويمحص ما قدمه العلماء العرب، والمواضع التي استفاد خلالها من المصادر العربية، ومدى استفادته منها، وقد توزع البحث على ثلاثة مباحث، تناول المبحث الأول التعريف بالكتاب موضع الدراسة ومنهجه، ويتعرض المبحث الثاني لمصادر المؤلف وملامح اتجاه المدرسة الكلامية، أما المبحث الثالث، فيتطرق إلى مصادر المؤلف وملامح الاستدلال والقياس والتضمين.
This research specifically aims to show the sources of the book "Secrets of Rhetoric/Introduction" by the Turkish writer Ismail Hakki, one of the most important books on Arabic rhetoric, and to show that his ideas related to the concepts of rhetoric, its codification, and its pillars, which were revealed in his introduction, are the result of purely Arab ideas. His citations came from the sources of the rhetorical heritage, a pivotal component in the hands of the Turkish author who moved them according to his purposes and objectives. He worked to employ them to serve his multiple goals, and he often resorted to them to prove his ideas and strengthen his argument in the rhetorical issues at hand. On the other hand, these texts worked to shape his trends in His rhetorical lesson Revealing the features of this formation is one of the goals of the research, which also seeks to refute what has spread among some Turkish researchers about the mixing of the principles of rhetoric of the Turkish writer- the subject of the study- with Western rhetorical discourse, and the evidence is the documentation he provided with his pen in his book for a group of sources. Arabic rhetoric, he learned from its owners and benefited from their opinions, and it formed a rich material in the book. Then the research goes to reveal how he received these sources, the extent of his ability to study and examine what Arab scholars presented, the places in which he benefited from Arab sources, and the extent to which he benefited from them. The research was divided into three sections. The first section dealt with introducing the book under study and its methodology. The second section dealt with the author's sources and the features of the direction of the theological school. The third section dealt with the author's sources and the features of inference, analogy, and implication.
|
