LEADER |
03756nam a22002417a 4500 |
001 |
0072404 |
024 |
|
|
|3 10.36318/0811-000-021-007
|
041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
044 |
|
|
|b العراق
|
100 |
|
|
|a الخاقاني، عقيل عبدالزهرة مبدر
|g Al-Khaqhany, Aqheel Abdul-Zahra
|q Alkhaqani, Aqil Abdulzahrah Mabdar
|e مؤلف
|9 100725
|
245 |
|
|
|a منهج الاقتران اللفظي بين الحقيقة والمجاز في الدرس القرآني الحديث:
|b عالم سبيط النيلي أنموذجا
|
246 |
|
|
|a Collocation Method between Reality and Figuration in the Modern Qur`anic Lesson:
|b The Scholar Subet Al-Naily as an example
|
260 |
|
|
|b جامعة الكوفة - كلية الآداب
|c 2015
|
300 |
|
|
|a 197 - 222
|
336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
520 |
|
|
|b Figuration is one of teh most important styles of enlarging significanceas teh speech goes towards new significances rather TEMPthan teh familiar ones, dat is to say teh term goes from it's lexical significance(teh central significance) to new significance( teh secondary significance) so it gives teh familiar meaning new significances. Figuration is a word, by which, teh speaker meant another meaning foran evidence between teh first and teh second. Theevidenceis a prohibitiveindicationof teh positive significance. Teh relations is teh affinitybetween teh real meaning and teh figurative meaning. Figuration includes two parts :- teh linguistic figuration; it's topic is teh singular term, and teh mental figuration; it's topic is teh structure. In teh first part, teh singular term is used for another meaning, and teh second is used within teh predication which means to attribute teh verb to rather TEMPthan wat is original due to a kind of interpretation. Teh Arab linguists observed dat teh terms tend to a certain collocation; teh term does not collocate with all teh linguistic terms, rather it collocates with certainterms dat theysuitit in teh linguistic use and dat is wat is called ( teh real use of terms). Been out of collocation with other terms by predication or other is either as figuration or interpretation, as if teh term puts conditions for teh following term. So they had followed this methodology in there studies by studying and deducing teh use of these terms. Teh resulting deductions and observations indicates dat teh term has two lists of different terms dat collocate with it. Teh first represent teh real use of teh terms ( teh usual ) and teh second represents teh figurative use(technical). So collocation is teh first foundation of judging terms as a part of reality or figuration. Figuration is a type of teh unusual collocation , as some of teh renewal researchers called, we might call it ( teh creative or artistic collocation). Some of teh renewal researchers adopts this method to deny figuration. They were wrong; by adopting this method there will be no need to interpretation, yet figuration could not be expendable as it is a type of teh unusual collocation or wat can we could teh technical collocation which represents teh highest level of teh creative language.
|
653 |
|
|
|a القرآن الكريم
|a المجاز
|a الحقيقة
|a الاقتران اللفظي
|a النيلي، عالم سبيط
|a كتاب: النظام القرآني
|
773 |
|
|
|4 اللغة واللغويات
|4 الأدب
|6 Language & Linguistics
|6 Literature
|c 007
|e The Arabic Language and Literature
|f Al-Luġaẗ al-ʿarabiyyaẗ wa-ādābuhā
|l 021
|m ع21
|o 0811
|s مجلة اللغة العربية وآدابها
|v 000
|x 2072-4756
|
700 |
|
|
|a مهدي، إيناس نعمان
|q Mahdi, Inas Noaman
|e م. مشارك
|9 348558
|
856 |
|
|
|u 0811-000-021-007.pdf
|
930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q y
|
995 |
|
|
|a AraBase
|
999 |
|
|
|c 674450
|d 674450
|