ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الإثبات عبئاً وحقاً : دراسة قانونية مقارنة بالفقه الإسلامي

العنوان بلغة أخرى: Evidencing process as a burden and as a right legal study with Islamic jurisprudence
المصدر: مجلة الكوفة للعلوم القانونية والسياسية
الناشر: جامعة الكوفة - كلية القانون
المؤلف الرئيسي: الخفاجي، عزيز كاظم جبر (مؤلف)
مؤلفين آخرين: كزار، عمار محسن (م. مشارك)
المجلد/العدد: مج7, ع21
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2014
التاريخ الهجري: 1436
الصفحات: 7 - 41
ISSN: 2070-9838
رقم MD: 675576
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo, EcoLink
مواضيع:
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

60

حفظ في:
المستخلص: when deliver his judgments, judge decides according to evidence that he has accepted. Opponent which adduces the more reliable evidence will ultimately win the case at issue. Hence all litigants will do their utmost to convince judges that their evidence is more reliable and admissible than the evidence of their opponents. Consequently, in every case there will be conflicting and contradicting evidence that judge has to evaluate and to outbalance contradicting evidence. This study addresses the problem of contradiction of evidence in civil proceedings. The issue of contradiction of evidence is a logical-legal problem which faces judges in almost every case. The judgment is a multi-factor process based on three main elements; facts, law, and evidence. Without evidence , disputed rights cannot be protected and then they devoid the character of legal and enforceable right. Due to the lack of provisions which address the issue of contradiction of evidence, the study relied on comparison between law and Islamic jurisprudence. The study discussed the attitude of Islamic jurisprudence and then it moved to the attitude of Iraqi and Egyptian laws. thesis has been divided into two chapters with introductory section which has discussed the mean of evidence.

ISSN: 2070-9838