| LEADER |
02793nam a22002297a 4500 |
| 001 |
0111272 |
| 024 |
|
|
|3 10.21608/MERCJ.2016.79047
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b مصر
|
| 100 |
|
|
|9 375199
|a Mikhail, Ihab Adel Fawzy
|e Author
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a A Pragma stylistic Analysis of The Linguistic Strategies Manipulated In Presidential and Philosophical Debates
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b جامعة عين شمس - مركز بحوث الشرق الأوسط
|c 2015
|g مارس
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 66 - 84
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b This study attempts a pragma-stylistic and pragma- discursive analysis of the strategies or techniques adopted in presidential and philosophical debates. \ The study analyses two debates. First, the Presidential debate between Obama and McCain at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York on October 15, 2008. The second debate forming the corpus of this study is the debate between Dr. Greg Bahnsen and Dr. Gordon Stein, both highly ranked philosophers and debaters of their time. The second debate is known worldwide as “The Great Debate” entitled “Does God Exist?"” This debate took place on February 11, 1985 at the University of California at Irvine. \ The reason for the choice of these two debates is that one of them represents a political debate at a high standard administration in the number-one-advanced-country that holds most of the threads of the political game in the world. The other debate focuses on the everlasting philosophical religious question: “Does God Exist?” It will be seen that there are Argumentative Strategies in common despite the fact that religious philosophy and politics are worlds apart. \ The tools used for analysis are mostly pragmatic, partly stylistic and discursive: deixis, implicature, speech acts, presupposition, Cooperative Principle, persuasion and logical fallacies.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a اللغة
|a النقاش
|a البراغماتية
|a التعريض
|a التحليل النقدى للخطاب
|
| 692 |
|
|
|b philosophy of language
|b indeterminacy of meaning
|b logical positivism
|b language games
|b debate
|b ideology
|b worldview
|b power
|b control
|b discourse analysis DA
|b critical discourse analysis CDA
|b critical discourse studies CDS
|b conversational analysis CAturn constitutional units TCU
|b deixis
|b principle CP-persuasion:logos
|b pathos and ethos
|b logic
|b logical fallacies
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 العلوم الإنسانية ، متعددة التخصصات
|4 الأدب
|6 Humanities, Multidisciplinary
|6 Literature
|c 025
|e Middle East Research Journal
|f Maġallaẗ Bḥūṯ Āl-Šrq Āl-Āūsṭ
|l 036
|m ع36
|o 0808
|s مجلة بحوث الشرق الأوسط
|v 000
|x 2536-9504
|
| 856 |
|
|
|n https://mercj.journals.ekb.eg/article_79047.html
|u 0808-000-036-025.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q y
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a EcoLink
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 718955
|d 718955
|
