| LEADER |
05951nam a22002657a 4500 |
| 001 |
1688280 |
| 024 |
|
|
|3 10.35246/jols.v33i1.11
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b العراق
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a الغواري، زايد علي زايد
|g Al-Ghawari, Zayed Ali Zayed
|e مؤلف
|9 232308
|
| 242 |
|
|
|a Authenticity of the Provisions of International Criminal Justice and the Mechanism for Its Implementation
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a حجية الأحكام في القضاء الجنائي الدولي وآلية تنفيذها
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b جامعة بغداد - كلية القانون
|c 2018
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 60 - 88
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a بعد الانتهاء من مرحلة المحاكمة وصيرورة الحكم نهائياً في المحاكم الجنائية الدولية، تأتي مرحلة تنفيذ هذه الأحكام التي تصدرها المحكمة، ومدى حجيتها إزاء القضاء الوطني واستنادا إلى مبدأ التكامل فإن الأحكام التي تصدرها المحكمة الجنائية الدولية يكون لها الحجية إزاء القضاء الوطني، وإزاء المحكمة الجنائية الدولية ذاتها؛ حيث لا يجوز محاكمة الشخص عن الجريمة ذاتها مرتين سواء أمام المحكمة الجنائية الدولية، أو أمام المحاكم الجنائية الوطنية عن سلوك شكل الأساس لجرائم كانت المحكمة قد أدانت الشخص بها، أو برأته منها، كل ذلك بشرط أن تجري المحاكمة وفقا لما قرره النظام الأساسي للمحكمة الجنائية الدولية، والقواعد الإجرائية، وقواعد الإثبات؛ فإذا ما جاءت المحاكمة على خلاف ذلك فإن هذه الأحكام لا تكون لها الحجية، كما يعتمد في تنفيذ هذه الأحكام على الدول الأطراف في الاتفاق أو الدول التي قبلت باختصاص المحكمة حيالها بموجب اتفاق ثنائي بين هذه الدولة والمحكمة، سواء كان ذلك في تنفيذ العقوبات السالبة للحرية أو العقوبات المالية، غير أنها قد احتفظت لنفسها في نظامها الأساسي بسلطة الأشراف والمراقبة على الدول في عمليات تنفيذ الأحكام.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|f Following the completion of the trial phase and the final judgement in the international criminal courts, the implementation of these judgments handed down by the Court and the extent to which they are authoritative against national jurisdiction. Based on the principle of complementarity, the judgments handed down by the International Criminal Court shall be subject to judicial authority. and against the International Criminal Court itself, where a person may not be tried twice for the same crime either before the International Criminal Court or before national criminal courts for conduct that formed the basis for crimes for which the Court has convicted or acquitted the person, all provided that the trial is conducted in accordance with as established by the Statute of the International Criminal Court, the Rules of Procedure and the Rules of Evidence; if the trial is to the contrary, these provisions shall not be authoritative as The implementation of these provisions depends on States parties to the Agreement or States with respect to which the Court's jurisdiction has been accepted by an Bilateral agreement between the State and the Court, whether in the execution of custodial or financial penalties, but it has retained in its Statute the power to supervise and control States in the enforcement of sentences.\nThis abstract translated by Dar AlMandumah Inc 2018.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|e After the trial stage is completed and the judgment becomes final in the international criminal courts, comes the stage of implementing these judgments issued by the court, and the extent of their relevance to the national judiciary. Based on the principle of complementarity, the rulings issued by the International Criminal Court are valid vis-à-vis the national judiciary, and vis-à-vis the International Criminal Court itself, where a person may not be tried for the same crime twice, whether before the International Criminal Court, or before national criminal courts, for a conduct that formed the basis for crimes for which the court had convicted the person, or acquitted him of them. All of this is provided that the trial takes place in accordance with the Statute of the International Criminal Court, the rules of procedure, and the rules of evidence. If the trial came to the contrary, then these rulings will not be valid, as the implementation of these rulings depends on the states party to the agreement or the states that accepted the jurisdiction of the court in respect of them according to a bilateral agreement between this state and the court, whether in the implementation of penalties with no freedom or financial penalties, however, it has reserved for itself in its statute the authority to supervise and monitor states in the execution of sentences. This abstract was translated by Dar AlMandumah Inc
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a الأحكام القضائية
|a حجية الأحكام القضائية
|a القضاء الجنائي الدولي
|a المحاكم الجنائية الدولية
|a القضاء الوطني
|
| 700 |
|
|
|a الدقانى، خالد محمد
|g Dganii, Khalid Mohamed
|e م. مشارك
|9 506082
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 القانون
|6 Law
|c 003
|e Journal of Legal Sciences
|f Mağallaẗ al-ʻulūm al-qānūniyyaẗ
|l 001
|m مج33, ع1
|o 1955
|s مجلة العلوم القانونية
|v 033
|x 2070-027X
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 1955-033-001-003.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q n
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a IslamicInfo
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 942105
|d 942105
|
