520 |
|
|
|f The foundation of pragmatics is a significant area of contemporary language lessons dating back to the 7th century, developed by three philosophies of the philosophical heritage, Austin, Searle, and Grice. Their focus was to find a way to communicate the meaning of the natural human language by communicating a message to a future interpreter.\nA pragmatic lesson is concerned with studying the communication between speaker and a addressee, or in other words, studying the symbols used by the speaker in the communication process, the factors influencing the selection of certain symbols but not the other, the relationship between speech and the context of its situation, and the effect of the relationship between the speaker and the addressee in conversation. \nThis is why it is the starting point for pragmatism, in its modern sense, for British linguistic philosophers, particularly in two lecture series presented at Harvard University, they are lectures of William James, delivered by Austin in 1955, and by Paul Grace in 1967. They were published with the title (How to do things with words?), These lectures led to an attention to the level of knowledge in natural languages, and were also concerned with the study of non-linguistic phenomena associated with the language creativity (context, place, speakers, their purpose, usage, and reference). \nThis fact imposes itself on the table of modern linguistic studies, which is approved by linguists and is confirmed by linguists. Linguistics is hardly mentioned with its different branches, but the names of Western scholars are underlined. However, a careful reading of the texts of our Arab heritage confirms that the origins of linguistic theories are rooted in the Arabic language lesson scientifically -although these theories are not framed in simulating the framing of modern theories- However, in their perspective, the Arabs used to establish the theories and principles taught in the modern language lesson. Those who would study the heritage will find the trace of communication theory in linguistic heritage. Researchers in their different books prove the Arab scholars to be pioneers to modern communication issues and theories that are proven by the pragmatic school and attributed to its scholars. If you dismiss the roots of pragmatics and its related foundations among Arab scholars, then you find it scattered in the chapters of Arabic rhetoric, and you find Arabic scholars have separated the discussion in context and its use and explained the meaning of linguistic works and its power of craftsmanship and commitment. The issues of pragmatics are dealt with by more than one such as Sibawayh (Death 180 AH), who drew in the chapter of straightness a model of the most important foundations of pragmatics by relying on the context, which demonstrates his pragmatic lead and what language philosophers went to.\nAbu al-Abbas al-Mubarrid's answer (d. 285 AH) to the question of the Canadian philosopher is evidence of his awareness of the dimensions of the power of literal linguistic structures and their obligation to talk about them. This is evident in the writings of Abu Othman Al-Jahez (d. 255 AH), who focused on the transparency of the discourse, which is the ability of the sign and the text to refer to others. Abu Othman Al-Jahez's attempt was characterized by a clearly beneficial nature, which could be considered — without exaggeration — the complete attempt in the Arab linguistic heritage to establish the so-called The usefulness of the discourse. The scholars of the Arab world stood in scattered areas of their books on the different issues of linguistics, and differed over the issues of communicative linguistics, and increased them in detail and depth. The most famous of these are Ibn Jenni d. 293 AH), Al-Jirjani (d. 471 AH), Al-Saakki (t. 626 AH), Ibn al-Athir (d. 637 AH) and Ibn Khaldun. and others - and this is not strange for people who have gone beyond the research on the level of the right Arabic speaker. They searched beyond the word and explored a wider area described as Rhetoricians from those who have the virtue of distinction and knowledge and are frequented only by genuine Bedouins and people have nature of eloquence, and they have brought the art of knowledge in the taste of speech with which they are individuals.\nThis is what this work entitled "Fundamentals of pragmatics in our Arab heritage" seeks. It works to read Arab heritage in a modern perspective to establish pragmatics in our Arab heritage and to confirm the awareness of our scholars of the dimensions and principles of this theory, and to address its foundations and various branches. This work is not a call for neglecting what has been reached in the modern lesson in this theory. Rather, it emphasizes the need to benefit from the results of linguistic laboratories and to trust them, with a view to combining old and modern in the service of the texts of this language, particularly the Holy Qur'an.\nThis abstract translated by Dar AlMandumah Inc. 2018
|