| المستخلص: |
الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله. وبعد؛ فهذا بحث في ((الموقف الشرعي من جور أئمة المسلمين))، جعلته في خمسة مباحث وخاتمة، ذكرت فيه بعض المصطلحات المتعلقة بالبحث؛ كمعنى الجور، وبينت المراد ب(الأئمة) في البحث، وذكرت فيه حكم طاعة الأئمة في غير معصية الله، وحكم الخروج عليهم إذا جاروا، مدعما ذلك بنصوص الوحيين وكلام أئمة السنة، ثم ذكرت شبه من يرى الخروج على أئمة الجور من الخوارج، والمعتزلة، ومن نحا نحوهم، ورددت عليها بما تقتضيه طبيعة البحث، ثم ذكرت بعد ذلك الموقف الصحيح للمسلم من جور الأئمة، وذكرت فيه أربعة أصول دلت عليها النصوص الشرعية، وكلام أئمة السنة من سلف هذه الأمة، تجاه جور الأئمة، ثم ختمت البحث بأهم النتائج التي توصلت إليها، ومنها: 1. وجوب طاعة الأئمة ما لم يأمروا بمعصية. 2. يحرم الخروج على أئمة الجور، ما لم يكن ثمة كفر بواح عندنا فيه من الله برهان، ولابد من قيد آخر؛ وهو وجود القدرة على إزالته، وإلا الصر على جورهم. 3. لا حجة صحيحة لمن يرى الخروج على أئمة الجور من أهل الإسلام. 4. انعقد الإجماع على حرمة الخروج على أكمة الجور. 5. الخروج على أئمة الجور من أصول أهل الأهواء، كالخوارج، والمعتزلة. 6. ثم أربعة أصول للمسلم تجاه جور أئمة المسلمين؛ هي: الصبر على جورهم، وعدم الخروج عليهم، وطاعتهم في غير معصية الله، ومناصحتهم، والدعاء لهم بالصلاح. ثم أوردت بعد الخاتمة فهرس المراجع، وفهرس موضوعات البحث. وصلى الله على نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه ومن سار على هديه.
In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful. All praise is due to Allah, and may Allah exalt and send blessings to the messenger of Allah. To proceed, the title of this research is: "The Sharia Stance Regarding the Oppression of the Muslim Rulers". I divided the research into five chapters and an ending and I mentioned some definitions pertaining the research, like the meaning of oppression as well as I explained the meaning of (rulers) in the research. I mentioned the ruling of obeying the leaders as long as it is not disobedience to Allah, as well as the ruling of revolting against them if they are oppressive in accordance to the evidences from the two revelations and the sayings of the scholars from the Salaf. I mentioned the doubts by those who say that revolutions are allowed against the oppressive rulers like Khawarij, Mu'tazilah and those who have the same ideology. I refuted them after mentioning their stances in accordance to what is appropriate for the research. I also mentioned the correct position of a Muslim in regards to the oppressive rulers. That was explained through four principles based in the Islamic evidences and the statements of the Imam's of Sunnah from the predecessors of this Ummah regarding the oppression of the rulers. I ended the research with the most important conclusions that I reached. From them: 1) It is obligatory to obey the rulers as long as they do not order with sins. 2) It is forbidden to revolt against the oppressive rulers, as long as they have not made clear unbelief that we have proofs for. We also need another important condition and that is having the capability of removing them, otherwise we have to have patience with their oppression. 3)There is not any correct proof that permits revolting against the oppressive rulers as long as they are Muslims. 4)The scholars have consensus that it is unpermitted to revolt against the oppressive rulers. 5)Revolting against rulers is from the foundations of the people of desires like: Khawarij and Mu'tazilah. 6)Four principles for the Muslim regarding the oppression of the Muslim rulers, and they are: having patience with their oppression, not revolting against them, obeying them in that which is not disobedience to Allah, giving them advice and supplicating for them to be righteous. I mentioned the index for references and the index for the subjects after the ending. May Allah exalt our prophet, his family, companions and those who followed his path.
|
