| LEADER |
06122nam a22002537a 4500 |
| 001 |
1816921 |
| 024 |
|
|
|3 10.54643/1951-005-002-008
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a ara
|
| 044 |
|
|
|b السعودية
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a الحسينان، إبراهيم بن عبدالله
|g Al Husainan, Ibrahim bin Abdullah
|e مؤلف
|9 439064
|
| 245 |
|
|
|a تقويم مدى تطابق مفهوم التسويف النشط مع سلوك التسويف:
|b دراسة للتحقق من صدق البناء لمقياس التسويف النشط
|
| 246 |
|
|
|a Assessing the Compatibility of the Active Procrastination Concept with the Procrastination Behavior:
|b A Study to Examine the Construct Validity of Active Procrastination Scale
|
| 260 |
|
|
|b جامعة الأمير سطام بن عبدالعزيز
|c 2020
|g يوليو
|m 1441
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 279 - 311
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a بحوث ومقالات
|b Article
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى التحقق من مدي تطابق مفهوم التسويف النشط مع سلوك التسويف، من خلال التحقق من بعض مؤشرات صدق البناء لمقياس التسويف النشط لشوي وموران (Choi & Moran, 2009)، ولتحقيق هذا الهدف طُبق على عينة مكونة من (129) طالبا من طلاب الدبلوم التربوي في جامعة المجمعة، وكشفت نتائج الدراسة عن بناء عامل مكون من ثلاثة عوامل لمقياس التسويف النشط، وهي: الرضا بالنتائج تحت الضغط، والقرار المتعمد بالتسويف، والقدرة على الوفاء بالمواعيد النهائية. وكان عامل الرضا بالنتائج وعامل تفضيل العمل تحت الضغط عاملين غير مستقلين. كما أشارت النتائج إلى أن التسويف النشط يرتبط سلبيا بالتسويف الأكاديمي، وإيجابيا بالكفاءة الذاتية ويقظة الضمير، بينما لم تكن هناك علاقة بين التسويف النشط والعصابية، وتدل هذه النتائج على أن التسويف النشط مختلف عن خصائص التسويف، وخلصت الدراسة إلى عدم تحقق صدق البناء لمقياس التسويف النشط، وعليه تمت التوصية بالتحفظ على استخدامه لقياس التسويف.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|b The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which the active procrastination concept compatibility with the procrastination behavior by determining some the indicators of the Construct Validity of the active procrastination scale for (Choi & Moran, 2009). To achieve this goal, the scale was applied on a sample of 129 students from the educational diploma in Majmaah University. The results of the study revealed a factor construct consisting of three factors for the active procrastination scale: satisfying outcomes under pressure, intentional decision to procrastination, ability to meet final promises. The results indicated that outcome satisfaction and preference for pressure are not independent factors. The results also indicated that active procrastination negatively correlates with academic procrastination, and positively correlates with self- efficacy and conscientiousness, while there is no correlation between active procrastination and neuroticism. These results indicate that active procrastination differs from the characteristics of procrastination. The study concluded that the Construct Validity of the active procrastination scale has not been achieved, therefore, the study recommended not to prevail using that scale to measure procrastination. The results of the study revealed a factor construct consisting of three factors for the active procrastination scale: satisfying outcomes under pressure, intentional decision to procrastination, ability to meet final promises. The results indicated that outcome satisfaction and preference for pressure are not independent factors. The results also indicated that active procrastination negatively correlates with academic procrastination, and positively correlates with self- efficacy and conscientiousness, while there is no correlation between active procrastination and neuroticism. These results indicate that active procrastination differs from the characteristics of procrastination. The study concluded that the Construct Validity of the active procrastination scale has not been achieved, therefore, the study recommended not to prevail using that scale to measure procrastination. The results of the study revealed a factor construct consisting of three factors for the active procrastination scale: satisfying outcomes under pressure, intentional decision to procrastination, ability to meet final promises. The results indicated that outcome satisfaction and preference for pressure are not independent factors. The results also indicated that active procrastination negatively correlates with academic procrastination, and positively correlates with self-efficacy and conscientiousness, while there is no correlation between active procrastination and neuroticism. These results indicate that active procrastination differs from the characteristics of procrastination. The study concluded that the Construct Validity of the active procrastination scale has not been achieved, therefore, the study recommended not to prevail using that scale to measure procrastination.
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a علم النفس التربوي
|a التسويف الأكاديمي
|a الاختبارات والمقاييس التربوية
|
| 692 |
|
|
|a التسويف النشط
|a التسويف الأكاديمي
|a صدق البناء
|b Active Procrastination
|b Academic Procrastination
|b Construct Validity
|
| 773 |
|
|
|4 التربية والتعليم
|6 Education & Educational Research
|c 008
|e Journal of Educational Sciences
|f majalat aleulum altarbawia
|l 002
|m مج5, ع2
|o 1951
|s مجلة العلوم التربوية
|v 005
|x 1658-7448
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u 1951-005-002-008.pdf
|
| 930 |
|
|
|d y
|p y
|q n
|
| 995 |
|
|
|a EduSearch
|
| 999 |
|
|
|c 1077283
|d 1077283
|
