Interim Relief and Emergency Arbitration in Singapore, UK and UAE: A Comparative Review of Practices and Procedures
| المصدر: | مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية |
|---|---|
| الناشر: | كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية |
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | Ezeoke, Chinyere (Author) |
| مؤلفين آخرين: | Singh, Ananya Pratap (Co-Author) |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج7, ملحق |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: |
الكويت |
| التاريخ الميلادي: |
2019
|
| التاريخ الهجري: | 1440 |
| الشهر: | مايو |
| الصفحات: | 275 - 314 |
| DOI: |
10.54032/2203-007-998-002 |
| ISSN: |
2410-2237 |
| رقم MD: | 1100990 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| قواعد المعلومات: | IslamicInfo |
| مواضيع: | |
| كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية: |
Expedited Procedure | Emergency Arbitrators | Interim Relief | UNCITRAL Model Law | Arbitral Institutions | UK | UAE | Singapore
|
| رابط المحتوى: |
عدد مرات التحميل
8
| المستخلص: |
The limited powers of arbitrators in granting interim measures and the delay involved in constituting arbitral tribunals often mean that parties have to resort to the national courts, thereby undermining the objective in choosing arbitration. To deal with this, major arbitral institutions including the DIAC, SIAC and LCIA introduced expedited procedures and (for the latter two) emergency arbitration procedures for urgent interim relief where delay would otherwise prejudice a party. However, differences exist in the institutional rules and the arbitration statutes in Singapore, UK and UAE on the workings of these procedures. The paper discusses the concurrent jurisdiction of the courts and arbitral tribunals in granting interim measures and assesses the impact of the interplay of the roles. It evaluates the types of interim measures and the standards applied in granting them. Further, the nature of the decision of the emergency arbitrator and issues of enforceability are considered. It concludes with suggestions for more efficient administration of interim relief in arbitration. These include clarifying the position where relief is sought from the court which can be obtained from arbitration; providing for the standards to be satisfied for the grant of interim relief; standardizing the format in framing the decisions of emergency arbitrators and providing for the enforceability of their decisions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: |
2410-2237 |
عناصر مشابهة
-
The Implication of the Interim Measures Issued by Arbitrator: A Comparative Analysis
بواسطة: Alajmy, Abd Almohsen منشور: (2021) -
The Jordanian Constitutional Court Decision Ruling Article 54 of the Jordanian Arbitration Act Unconstitutional: Is it an Obstacle against Arbitration?
بواسطة: Ababneh, Alaeldin منشور: (2018) -
الاتجاهات الحديثة لمسؤولية المحكم وموقف القانون الكويتي منها
بواسطة: درادكة، لافي محمد موسى منشور: (2019) -
SCHEDULING DISASTER RELIEF OPERATIONS
بواسطة: Al Otaibi, Mazen منشور: (2008) -
Challenging the Enforcement of Emergency Arbitrator Decisions
بواسطة: براون، رافائيل دين منشور: (2020)
