ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







Interim Relief and Emergency Arbitration in Singapore, UK and UAE: A Comparative Review of Practices and Procedures

المصدر: مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
الناشر: كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Ezeoke, Chinyere (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Singh, Ananya Pratap (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج7, ملحق
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: الكويت
التاريخ الميلادي: 2019
التاريخ الهجري: 1440
الشهر: مايو
الصفحات: 275 - 314
DOI: 10.54032/2203-007-998-002
ISSN: 2410-2237
رقم MD: 1100990
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: IslamicInfo
مواضيع:
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Expedited Procedure | Emergency Arbitrators | Interim Relief | UNCITRAL Model Law | Arbitral Institutions | UK | UAE | Singapore
رابط المحتوى:
صورة الغلاف QR قانون

عدد مرات التحميل

8

حفظ في:
LEADER 02677nam a22002417a 4500
001 1842080
024 |3 10.54032/2203-007-998-002 
041 |a eng 
044 |b الكويت 
100 |9 592538  |a Ezeoke, Chinyere  |e Author 
245 |a Interim Relief and Emergency Arbitration in Singapore, UK and UAE:  |b A Comparative Review of Practices and Procedures 
260 |b كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |c 2019  |g مايو  |m 1440 
300 |a 275 - 314 
336 |a بحوث ومقالات  |b Article 
520 |b The limited powers of arbitrators in granting interim measures and the delay involved in constituting arbitral tribunals often mean that parties have to resort to the national courts, thereby undermining the objective in choosing arbitration. To deal with this, major arbitral institutions including the DIAC, SIAC and LCIA introduced expedited procedures and (for the latter two) emergency arbitration procedures for urgent interim relief where delay would otherwise prejudice a party. However, differences exist in the institutional rules and the arbitration statutes in Singapore, UK and UAE on the workings of these procedures. The paper discusses the concurrent jurisdiction of the courts and arbitral tribunals in granting interim measures and assesses the impact of the interplay of the roles. It evaluates the types of interim measures and the standards applied in granting them. Further, the nature of the decision of the emergency arbitrator and issues of enforceability are considered. It concludes with suggestions for more efficient administration of interim relief in arbitration. These include clarifying the position where relief is sought from the court which can be obtained from arbitration; providing for the standards to be satisfied for the grant of interim relief; standardizing the format in framing the decisions of emergency arbitrators and providing for the enforceability of their decisions. 
653 |a الإغاثة المؤقتة  |a الاجراءات التحكيمية  |a القوانين والتشريعات  |a سنغافورة  |a الأمم المتحدة 
692 |b Expedited Procedure  |b Emergency Arbitrators  |b Interim Relief  |b UNCITRAL Model Law  |b Arbitral Institutions  |b UK  |b UAE  |b Singapore 
700 |9 592540  |a Singh, Ananya Pratap  |e Co-Author 
773 |4 القانون  |6 Law  |c 002  |e kuwait International law School Journal  |f Mağallaẗ kulliyyaẗ al-qānūn al-kuwaytiyyaẗ al-ʿālamiyyaẗ  |l 998  |m مج7, ملحق  |o 2203  |s مجلة كلية القانون الكويتية العالمية  |v 007  |x 2410-2237 
856 |u 2203-007-998-002.pdf 
930 |d y  |p y  |q n 
995 |a IslamicInfo 
999 |c 1100990  |d 1100990 

عناصر مشابهة